Honda FMX650 2005 vs. Husqvarna TE 250 2016

Honda FMX650 2005

Honda FMX650 2005

Husqvarna TE 250 2016

Husqvarna TE 250 2016

Loading...

Overview - Honda FMX650 2005 vs Husqvarna TE 250 2016

Honda FMX650 2005

Honda FMX650 2005

Husqvarna TE 250 2016

Husqvarna TE 250 2016

Technical Specifications Honda FMX650 2005 compared to Husqvarna TE 250 2016

Honda FMX650 2005
Husqvarna TE 250 2016

Engine and Drive Train

TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
CylindersCylinders1Cylinders1
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes2-Stroke
DisplacementDisplacement644 ccmDisplacement249 ccm

Dimensions and Weights

WheelbaseWheelbase1,490 mmWheelbase1,482 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height875 mmSeat Height960 mm
Dry WeightDry Weight163 kgDry Weight104.4 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity11 lFuel Tank Capacity11 l

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Honda FMX650 2005

Honda FMX650 2005

The bike is nimble in the city, uncomplicated to handle and very frugal in terms of service costs.

Uncomplicated driving pleasure

looks

nice torque curve

beginner-friendly

high-quality chassis

good brake system

easy handling.

Not too high performance

inadvisable for somewhat longer tours.

Husqvarna TE 250 2016

Husqvarna TE 250 2016

Completely new engine for 2017! Lighter and quieter, thanks to the balancer shaft. In terms of responsiveness, the 250 moves more towards 300. The 250 also has significantly more punch in the lower rev range! The limits between 250 and 300 are now vanishingly small.

Price acquisition

price maintenance

performance

handling

unbeatable in hard terrain

I would prefer a four-stroke on smooth and easy tracks

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Honda FMX650 vs Husqvarna TE 250

Price Honda FMX650

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Husqvarna TE 250

Model year
Current average market prices

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH