Honda CBF 125 2009 vs. Husqvarna TE 250 2016

Honda CBF 125 2009

Husqvarna TE 250 2016

Technical Specifications Honda CBF 125 2009 compared to Husqvarna TE 250 2016

Honda CBF 125 2009

Husqvarna TE 250 2016

Honda CBF 125 2009

Husqvarna TE 250 2016

Engine and Drive Train

Bore	Bore	52.4 mm	Bore	66.4 mm
Stroke	Stroke	57.8 mm	Stroke	72 mm
Starter	Starter	Electric	Starter	Electric, Kick
Transmission	Transmission	Chain	Transmission	Chain
Cylinders	Cylinders	1	Cylinders	1
Strokes	Strokes	4-Stroke	Strokes	2-Stroke
Displacement	Displacement	124.7 ccm	Displacement	249 ccm

Brakes Rear

Type	Type	Drum	Type	Disc

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre diameter	Front tyre diameter	17 inch	Front tyre diameter	21 inch
Rear tyre diameter	Rear tyre diameter	17 inch	Rear tyre diameter	18 inch
Wheelbase	Wheelbase	1,270 mm	Wheelbase	1,482 mm
Seat Height	Seat Height	792 mm	Seat Height	960 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity	Fuel Tank Capacity	13 l	Fuel Tank Capacity	11 l

Pros and Cons in comparison

Honda CBF 125 2009

Thanks to its extremely low fuel consumption, it's a tip for those who want to save money. In the city, the CBF can play to its strengths, but powerful braking is not one of them.

Manoeuvrability

sleek lines

low fuel consumption.

Brake not optimal

tiny storage compartment

Husqvarna TE 250 2016

Completely new engine for 2017! Lighter and quieter, thanks to the balancer shaft. In terms of responsiveness, the 250 moves more towards 300. The 250 also has significantly more punch in the lower rev range! The limits between 250 and 300 are now vanishingly small.

Price acquisition

price maintenance

performance

handling

unbeatable in hard terrain

I would prefer a four-stroke on smooth and easy tracks

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Honda CBF 125 vs Husqvarna TE 250

Price Honda CBF 125

Model year

Average market price

Current average market prices

Price Husqvarna TE 250

Model year

Average market price

Current average market prices