Husqvarna SM 510R 2010 vs. Husqvarna WR 125 2009

Husqvarna SM 510R 2010

Husqvarna SM 510R 2010

Husqvarna WR 125 2009

Husqvarna WR 125 2009

Loading...

Overview - Husqvarna SM 510R 2010 vs Husqvarna WR 125 2009

Husqvarna SM 510R 2010

Husqvarna SM 510R 2010

Husqvarna WR 125 2009

Husqvarna WR 125 2009

Technical Specifications Husqvarna SM 510R 2010 compared to Husqvarna WR 125 2009

Husqvarna SM 510R 2010
Husqvarna WR 125 2009

Engine and Drive Train

BoreBore97 mmBore54 mm
StrokeStroke67.8 mmStroke54.5 mm
StarterStarterElectricStarterKick
DisplacementDisplacement501 ccmDisplacement124 ccm

Suspension Front

BrandBrandMarzocchiBrandSachs

Suspension Rear

BrandBrandMarzocchiBrandSachs

Brakes Front

TechnologyTechnologyWaveTechnologyWave

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter21 inch
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter18 inch
WheelbaseWheelbase1,445 mmWheelbase1,465 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height920 mmSeat Height975 mm
Dry WeightDry Weight120.5 kgDry Weight101 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity7.2 lFuel Tank Capacity7 l

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Husqvarna SM 510R vs Husqvarna WR 125

Price Husqvarna SM 510R

Unfortunately, the data available to us is not sufficient to provide meaningful price information for this model.

Price Husqvarna WR 125

Model year
Current average market prices