Kawasaki ER-6n 2013 vs. Kawasaki Z650 2021

Kawasaki ER-6n 2013

Kawasaki ER-6n 2013

Kawasaki Z650 2021

Kawasaki Z650 2021

Loading...

Overview - Kawasaki ER-6n 2013 vs Kawasaki Z650 2021

The Kawasaki ER-6n 2013 and the Kawasaki Z650 2021 are both naked bikes with similar technical specifications. They both have an inline engine with a displacement of 649cc and liquid cooling. They also have the same number of cylinders and a monoshock rear suspension.

In terms of engine power, the ER-6n 2013 has a slightly higher output with 72 HP compared to the Z650 2021's 68.2 HP. However, the Z650 2021 has a slightly higher torque of 65.7 Nm compared to the ER-6n 2013's 64 Nm. This means that the Z650 2021 may offer better low-end power and acceleration.

Both bikes have a steel frame, but the ER-6n 2013 has a perimeter frame while the Z650 2021 has a tubular frame. The choice of frame design may affect the overall rigidity and handling characteristics of the bike, but without further information, it is difficult to determine the exact differences.

Kawasaki ER-6n 2013

Kawasaki ER-6n 2013

In terms of braking, both bikes have double disc brakes with double piston calipers and petal technology. However, the ER-6n 2013 is noted to have weak brakes, suggesting that the Z650 2021 may offer better braking performance.

In terms of dimensions and weights, both bikes have the same front and rear tire widths and diameters. They also have the same wheelbase length. However, the Z650 2021 has a lower seat height of 790 mm compared to the ER-6n 2013's 805 mm. This may make the Z650 2021 more accessible for shorter riders or those who prefer a lower seating position.

The Z650 2021 is also lighter with a kerb weight of 185 kg compared to the ER-6n 2013's 204 kg. This may contribute to better maneuverability and agility for the Z650 2021.

In terms of fuel tank capacity, the ER-6n 2013 has a slightly larger capacity of 16 liters compared to the Z650 2021's 15 liters.

Kawasaki Z650 2021

Kawasaki Z650 2021

In terms of strengths, the ER-6n 2013 is praised for its solid handling and high-quality level. On the other hand, the Z650 2021 is noted for its accessible two-cylinder engine, compact dimensions, low seat height, stable chassis, TFT display with connectivity, and grown-up look.

In terms of weaknesses, the ER-6n 2013 is criticized for its weak brakes. The Z650 2021, on the other hand, may be uncomfortable for tall riders and may offer a lower adrenaline level in the saddle compared to its competition.

Overall, both bikes have their own strengths and weaknesses. The choice between the Kawasaki ER-6n 2013 and the Kawasaki Z650 2021 would depend on the rider's preferences and priorities, such as power, handling, seating position, and overall riding experience.

Technical Specifications Kawasaki ER-6n 2013 compared to Kawasaki Z650 2021

Kawasaki ER-6n 2013
Kawasaki Z650 2021

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeIn line
BoreBore83 mmBore83 mm
StrokeStroke60 mmStroke60 mm
Engine powerEngine power72 HPEngine power68.2 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power8,500 rpmRpm at Max. Power8,000 rpm
TorqueTorque64 NmTorque65.7 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque7,000 rpmRpm at Torque7,000 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio10.8 Compression Ratio10.8
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
IgnitionIgnitionDigitalIgnitionDigital
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders2Cylinders2
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
Valves per cylinderValves per cylinder4Valves per cylinder4
ValvesValvesDOHCValvesDOHC
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement649 ccmDisplacement649 ccm

Suspension Rear

Shock absorberShock absorberMonoshockShock absorberMonoshock

Chassis

FrameFrameSteelFrameSteel
Frame typeFrame typePerimeterFrame typeTubular

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeDouble disk
PistonPistonDouble pistonPistonDouble piston
Shock mountShock mountSemi-SchwimmsattelShock mountSemi-Schwimmsattel
TechnologyTechnologyPetalTechnologyPetal

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
PistonPistonSingle pistonPistonSingle piston
Shock mountShock mountFloating caliperShock mountFloating caliper

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width160 mmRear tyre width160 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height60 %Rear tyre height60 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,110 mmLength2,055 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,410 mmWheelbase1,410 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height805 mmSeat Height790 mm
Kerb WeightKerb Weight204 kgKerb Weight185 kg
Kerb Weight (with ABS)Kerb Weight (with ABS)208 kgKerb Weight (with ABS)187.1 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity16 lFuel Tank Capacity15 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Kawasaki ER-6n 2013

Kawasaki ER-6n 2013

The engine is hearty and a lot of fun, plus the ER shines with a Japanese meticulous finish and a fighting price.

Solid handling

high quality level

weak brake

Kawasaki Z650 2021

Kawasaki Z650 2021

Even in 2021, the Kawasaki Z 650 stands for easy riding with great looks and good equipment. Both seat height and engine are very accessible and will give both experienced riders and newcomers a lot of pleasure. If you are looking for an honest naked bike without any big surprises, this is the bike for you. Due to its compact dimensions, however, you should try it out before buying and perhaps go for the raised seat.

accessible two-cylinder

compact dimensions

low seat height

stable chassis

TFT display with connectivity

grown-up look

Probably uncomfortable for tall riders

adrenaline level in the saddle lower than with the competition

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Kawasaki ER-6n vs Kawasaki Z650

There are a few key differences between a Kawasaki ER-6n 2013 and a Kawasaki Z650 2021. It takes less time to sell a Kawasaki ER-6n with 42 days compared to 106 days for a Kawasaki Z650. Since model year 2006 1000PS.de editors have written 16 reviews for the Kawasaki ER-6n and 31 reviews for the Kawasaki Z650 since model year 2017. The first review for the Kawasaki ER-6n was published on 6/29/2005 and now has more than 11,200 views. This compares to more than 25,000 views for the first review on Kawasaki Z650 published on 11/8/2016.

Price Kawasaki ER-6n

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Kawasaki Z650

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH