SWM SM 500 R 2020 vs. Husqvarna WR 300 2009

SWM SM 500 R 2020

Husqvarna WR 300 2009

Technical Specifications SWM SM 500 R 2020 compared to Husqvarna WR 300 2009

SWM SM 500 R 2020

Husqvarna WR 300 2009

SWM SM 500 R 2020

Husqvarna WR 300 2009

Engine and Drive Train

Bore	Bore	97 mm	Bore	72 mm
Stroke	Stroke	67.8 mm	Stroke	72 mm
Starter	Starter	Electric	Starter	Kick
Cooling	Cooling	liquid	Cooling	liquid
Displacement	Displacement	501 ccm	Displacement	293 ccm

Suspension Front

Brand	Brand	Kayaba	Brand	Sachs

Suspension Rear

Brand	Brand	Kayaba	Brand	Sachs

Brakes Rear

Type	Type	Disc	Type	Disc

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre diameter	Front tyre diameter	17 inch	Front tyre diameter	21 inch
Rear tyre diameter	Rear tyre diameter	17 inch	Rear tyre diameter	18 inch
Wheelbase	Wheelbase	1,465 mm	Wheelbase	1,465 mm
Seat Height	Seat Height	920 mm	Seat Height	975 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity	Fuel Tank Capacity	8 l	Fuel Tank Capacity	9.5 l

Pros and Cons in comparison

SWM SM 500 R 2020

The SM 500R is not a thoroughbred supermoto that only wants to be ridden on the kart track. You can have fun with it there, too, but narrow bends and mountain passes are its home. Thanks to its comfortable seat and pleasant riding position, it is also happy to go on short tours. In addition to the well-known components, SWM also focuses on a reasonable price.

easy to ride

very good handling

very comfortable for a Supermoto

At 140 kg, a bit heavy for a single-cylinder

ABS regulates very early on

Husqvarna WR 300 2009

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price SWM SM 500 R vs Husqvarna WR 300

Price SWM SM 500 R

Model year

Average market price

Current average market prices

Price Husqvarna WR 300

Unfortunately, the data available to us is not sufficient to provide meaningful price information for this model.