Kawasaki KLX 250 2009 vs. SWM RS 300 R 2016

Kawasaki KLX 250 2009

SWM RS 300 R 2016

Technical Specifications Kawasaki KLX 250 2009 compared to SWM RS 300 R 2016

Kawasaki KLX 250 2009

SWM RS 300 R 2016

Kawasaki KLX 250 2009

SWM RS 300 R 2016

Engine and Drive Train

Bore	Bore	72 mm	Bore	83 mm
Stroke	Stroke	61.2 mm	Stroke	55 mm
Ignition	Ignition	Digital	Ignition	Digital
Number of gears	Number of gears	6	Number of gears	6
Cylinders	Cylinders	1	Cylinders	1
Strokes	Strokes	4-Stroke	Strokes	4-Stroke
Cooling	Cooling	liquid	Cooling	liquid
Displacement	Displacement	249 ccm	Displacement	298 ccm

Brakes Rear

Type	Type	Disc	Type	Disc

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre diameter	Front tyre diameter	21 inch	Front tyre diameter	21 inch
Rear tyre diameter	Rear tyre diameter	18 inch	Rear tyre diameter	18 inch
Seat Height	Seat Height	890 mm	Seat Height	963 mm
Dry Weight	Dry Weight	138 kg	Dry Weight	107 kg
Fuel Tank Capacity	Fuel Tank Capacity	7.7 l	Fuel Tank Capacity	7.2 l

Pros and Cons in comparison

Kawasaki KLX 250 2009

On the typical motorbike routes, you become a moving obstacle on long uphill stretches. If you don't have anything to prove to anyone, you'll reach your destination a little later; the rest of us should go for more engine capacity.

Pleasant driving experience

really good off-road characteristics

quite stable and precise.

Climbing obstacles without momentum is not possible.

SWM RS 300 R 2016

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.