Husqvarna TE 125 2013 vs. SWM SM 125 R 2017

Husqvarna TE 125 2013

Husqvarna TE 125 2013

SWM SM 125 R 2017

SWM SM 125 R 2017

Loading...

Overview - Husqvarna TE 125 2013 vs SWM SM 125 R 2017

Husqvarna TE 125 2013

Husqvarna TE 125 2013

SWM SM 125 R 2017

SWM SM 125 R 2017

Technical Specifications Husqvarna TE 125 2013 compared to SWM SM 125 R 2017

Husqvarna TE 125 2013
SWM SM 125 R 2017

Engine and Drive Train

BoreBore54 mmBore58 mm
StrokeStroke54.5 mmStroke47.2 mm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio8.8 Compression Ratio12.8
StarterStarterKickStarterElectric
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
CylindersCylinders1Cylinders1
StrokesStrokes2-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
DisplacementDisplacement124 ccmDisplacement124.7 ccm

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width80 mmFront tyre width110 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height100 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter21 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width100 mmRear tyre width140 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height90 %Rear tyre height70 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter19 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
WheelbaseWheelbase1,460 mmWheelbase1,485 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height985 mmSeat Height913 mm
Dry WeightDry Weight92 kgDry Weight117 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity7 lFuel Tank Capacity7.2 l

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Husqvarna TE 125 2013

Husqvarna TE 125 2013

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.

SWM SM 125 R 2017

SWM SM 125 R 2017

Inexpensive 125cc with a very smart and sporty design.

Price

Optics

Brake

Chassis

Cold running behaviour: Tyres

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH