Husqvarna TE 510 2009 vs. SWM RS 500 R 2016

Husqvarna TE 510 2009

Husqvarna TE 510 2009

SWM RS 500 R 2016

SWM RS 500 R 2016

Loading...

Technical Specifications Husqvarna TE 510 2009 compared to SWM RS 500 R 2016

Husqvarna TE 510 2009
SWM RS 500 R 2016
Husqvarna TE 510 2009
Husqvarna TE 510 2009
SWM RS 500 R 2016
SWM RS 500 R 2016

Engine and Drive Train

BoreBore97 mmBore97 mm
StrokeStroke67.8 mmStroke67.8 mm
StarterStarterElectric, KickStarterElectric
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement510 ccmDisplacement501 ccm

Suspension Front

BrandBrandSachsBrandKayaba

Suspension Rear

BrandBrandSachsBrandKayaba

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter21 inchFront tyre diameter21 inch
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter18 inchRear tyre diameter18 inch
WheelbaseWheelbase1,495 mmWheelbase1,495 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height963 mmSeat Height963 mm
Dry WeightDry Weight112 kgDry Weight112 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity7.2 lFuel Tank Capacity7.2 l

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Husqvarna TE 510 vs SWM RS 500 R

Price Husqvarna TE 510

Model year
Current average market prices

Price SWM RS 500 R

Unfortunately, the data available to us is not sufficient to provide meaningful price information for this model.