Husqvarna SM 610 2009 vs. Husqvarna TE 610 2009

Husqvarna SM 610 2009

Husqvarna SM 610 2009

Husqvarna TE 610 2009

Husqvarna TE 610 2009

Loading...

Technical Specifications Husqvarna SM 610 2009 compared to Husqvarna TE 610 2009

Husqvarna SM 610 2009
Husqvarna TE 610 2009

Engine and Drive Train

BoreBore98 mmBore98 mm
StrokeStroke76.4 mmStroke76.4 mm
StarterStarterElectricStarterElectric
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement576 ccmDisplacement576 ccm

Suspension Front

BrandBrandSachsBrandSachs

Suspension Rear

BrandBrandSachsBrandSachs

Brakes Front

BrandBrandBremboBrandBrembo

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
BrandBrandBremboBrandBrembo

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter21 inch
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter18 inch
WheelbaseWheelbase1,485 mmWheelbase1,505 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height910 mmSeat Height940 mm
Dry WeightDry Weight142.5 kgDry Weight140.5 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity12.5 lFuel Tank Capacity12.5 l

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Husqvarna SM 610 2009

Husqvarna SM 610 2009

The Husky is by no means an inexpensive entry-level bike. However, single-cylinder enthusiasts looking for power, a great chassis and civil service intervals have come to the right place with the Husky. A good iron!

Optimal chassis

independent geometry

linear steering feel

high-quality fork

qualitative workmanship.

Hakelige ignition lock seems to have been reworked cheaply

high price

not suitable for long-distance travel

spare parts supply problematic.

Husqvarna TE 610 2009

Husqvarna TE 610 2009

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.

Alternative Comparisons