Yamaha FZ-8N 2011 vs. Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2011

Yamaha FZ-8N 2011

Yamaha FZ-8N 2011

Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2011

Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2011

Loading...

Overview - Yamaha FZ-8N 2011 vs Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2011

Yamaha FZ-8N 2011

Yamaha FZ-8N 2011

Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2011

Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2011

Technical Specifications Yamaha FZ-8N 2011 compared to Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2011

Yamaha FZ-8N 2011
Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2011

Engine and Drive Train

BoreBore68 mmBore74 mm
StrokeStroke53.6 mmStroke52.3 mm
Engine powerEngine power106 HPEngine power106 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power10,000 rpmRpm at Max. Power11,700 rpm
TorqueTorque82 NmTorque68 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque8,000 rpmRpm at Torque9,100 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio12 Compression Ratio12
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders4Cylinders3
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement779 ccmDisplacement675 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork

Chassis

Frame typeFrame typeDeltaboxFrame typeTwin Tube

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width180 mmRear tyre width180 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height55 %Rear tyre height55 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,140 mmLength2,030 mm
WidthWidth770 mmWidth731 mm
HeightHeight1,065 mmHeight1,250 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,460 mmWheelbase1,410 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height815 mmSeat Height805 mm
Kerb WeightKerb Weight211 kgKerb Weight167 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity17 lFuel Tank Capacity17.4 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Yamaha FZ-8N 2011

Yamaha FZ-8N 2011

But as in life, you can't demonise the "approximate 3/4 litre" concept of the FZ-8 by quickly leafing through the data sheets. That would be a shame, because the 8 has given us a lot of pleasure in the 3,200 kilometres we have covered so far. Contrary to the facts, the 800 is probably the best choice for the average ambitious rider.

Stable and stable

chassis relatively universal

large variety of accessories

acceptable performance

Footrest detent insert sets too early and brings unsteadiness into the chassis - as well as scraping on the ground

ugly exhaust

a bit cumbersome

Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2011

Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2011

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Yamaha FZ-8N vs Triumph Street Triple 675 R

Price Yamaha FZ-8N

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Triumph Street Triple 675 R

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons