Yamaha MT-09 SP 2024 vs. Yamaha R6 GYTR 2024

Yamaha MT-09 SP 2024

Yamaha MT-09 SP 2024

Yamaha R6 GYTR 2024

Yamaha R6 GYTR 2024

Loading...

Technical Specifications Yamaha MT-09 SP 2024 compared to Yamaha R6 GYTR 2024

Yamaha MT-09 SP 2024
Yamaha R6 GYTR 2024

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeIn line
BoreBore78 mmBore67 mm
StrokeStroke62.1 mmStroke42.5 mm
Engine powerEngine power119 HPEngine power118.4 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power10,000 rpmRpm at Max. Power14,500 rpm
TorqueTorque93 NmTorque61.7 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque7,000 rpmRpm at Torque10,500 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio11.5 Compression Ratio13.1
Fuel systemFuel systemInjectionFuel systemInjection
StarterStarterElectricStarterElectric
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
IgnitionIgnitionTransistorIgnitionTransistor
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Transmission TypeTransmission TypeGearshiftTransmission TypeGearshift
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders3Cylinders4
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
Valves per cylinderValves per cylinder4Valves per cylinder4
ValvesValvesDOHCValvesDOHC
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement890 ccmDisplacement599 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionTelescopic fork
DiameterDiameter41 mmDiameter43 mm
TravelTravel130 mmTravel120 mm

Suspension Rear

SuspensionSuspensionSwing armSuspensionSingle swing arm
Shock absorberShock absorberMonoshockShock absorberMonoshock
TravelTravel117 mmTravel120 mm

Chassis

Frame typeFrame typeTwin TubeFrame typeTwin Tube
RakeRake65 degreeRake24 degree
TrailTrail108 mmTrail97 mm

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeDouble disk
DiameterDiameter298 mmDiameter320 mm

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
DiameterDiameter245 mmDiameter220 mm

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width180 mmRear tyre width180 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height55 %Rear tyre height55 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,090 mmLength2,040 mm
WidthWidth820 mmWidth695 mm
HeightHeight1,145 mmHeight1,150 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,430 mmWheelbase1,375 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height825 mmSeat Height850 mm
Kerb Weight (with ABS)Kerb Weight (with ABS)194 kgKerb Weight (with ABS)190 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity14 lFuel Tank Capacity17 l
RangeRange280 kmRange257 km
Combined CO2 emissionsCombined CO2 emissions116 g/kmCombined CO2 emissions154 g/km
Combined fuel consumptionCombined fuel consumption5 l/100kmCombined fuel consumption6.6 l/100km

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Yamaha MT-09 SP 2024

Yamaha MT-09 SP 2024

The Yamaha MT-09 SP is a bike for connoisseurs - for riders who understand that perfection does not always lie in flawless smoothness, but sometimes in deliberate imperfection. It offers a unique blend of Japanese reliability, Swedish suspension expertise and Italian brakes passion, packed into a naked bike that cuts a fine figure both on country roads and in city traffic. If you are prepared to embrace the character of this three-cylinder and invest the extra price for the SP features, you will get a bike that is more than the sum of its parts - a vehicle with soul.

Characterful three-cylinder engine

High-quality Öhlins suspension

Excellent Brembo brake system

Comfortable seating position for long distances

Good workmanship and material quality

Versatile electronic equipment

Precise quickshifter

Lower peak power in segment comparison

limited high-speed stability

Yamaha R6 GYTR 2024

Yamaha R6 GYTR 2024

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Yamaha MT-09 SP vs Yamaha R6 GYTR

Price Yamaha MT-09 SP

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Yamaha R6 GYTR

Unfortunately, the data available to us is not sufficient to provide meaningful price information for this model.

Alternative Comparisons