Triumph Speedmaster 2006 vs. Honda CTX 700 N 2016

Triumph Speedmaster 2006

Triumph Speedmaster 2006

Honda CTX 700 N 2016

Honda CTX 700 N 2016

Loading...

Overview - Triumph Speedmaster 2006 vs Honda CTX 700 N 2016

Triumph Speedmaster 2006

Triumph Speedmaster 2006

Honda CTX 700 N 2016

Honda CTX 700 N 2016

Technical Specifications Triumph Speedmaster 2006 compared to Honda CTX 700 N 2016

Triumph Speedmaster 2006
Honda CTX 700 N 2016

Engine and Drive Train

Engine powerEngine power61 HPEngine power47.6 HP
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
CylindersCylinders2Cylinders2
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
CoolingCoolingAirCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement790 ccmDisplacement670 ccm

Dimensions and Weights

WheelbaseWheelbase1,655 mmWheelbase1,530 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height720 mmSeat Height720 mm
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity16.6 lFuel Tank Capacity12.4 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA2

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Triumph Speedmaster 2006

Triumph Speedmaster 2006

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.

Honda CTX 700 N 2016

Honda CTX 700 N 2016

The modern interpretation of a Honda Shadow that rides much better to boot. The CTX700N is a colourful bird, a truly exceptional and unique motorbike concept for individualists. Other manufacturers do not offer nearly as much technology, quality, rideability and fun in one vehicle. The fact that the CTX is not fish and not fowl is both positive and negative, I have taken it to my heart.

unique

mix of different concepts

DCT for little money

comfortable, easy to ride

low seat

Sloping position moderate

hardly any wind protection

special design

Price Comparison Average Market Price Triumph Speedmaster vs Honda CTX 700 N

Price Triumph Speedmaster

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Honda CTX 700 N

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons