Triumph Daytona 660 2024 vs. Suzuki GSX-S1000GT 2022

Triumph Daytona 660 2024

Triumph Daytona 660 2024

Suzuki GSX-S1000GT 2022

Suzuki GSX-S1000GT 2022

Loading...

Technical Specifications Triumph Daytona 660 2024 compared to Suzuki GSX-S1000GT 2022

Triumph Daytona 660 2024
Suzuki GSX-S1000GT 2022

Engine and Drive Train

BoreBore74 mmBore73.4 mm
StrokeStroke51.1 mmStroke59 mm
Engine powerEngine power95 HPEngine power152 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power11,250 rpmRpm at Max. Power11,000 rpm
TorqueTorque69 NmTorque106 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque8,250 rpmRpm at Torque9,250 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio12.05 Compression Ratio12.2
Can be restricted for A2 licenceCan be restricted for A2 licenceYesCan be restricted for A2 licence
DisplacementDisplacement660 ccmDisplacement999 ccm

Suspension Front

DiameterDiameter41 mmDiameter43 mm
TravelTravel110 mmTravel120 mm

Suspension Rear

TravelTravel130 mmTravel130 mm

Chassis

RakeRake23.8 degreeRake65 degree
TrailTrail82.3 mmTrail100 mm

Brakes Front

DiameterDiameter310 mmDiameter310 mm

Brakes Rear

DiameterDiameter220 mmDiameter250 mm

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width180 mmRear tyre width190 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height55 %Rear tyre height50 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,083 mmLength2,140 mm
WidthWidth736 mmWidth825 mm
HeightHeight1,145 mmHeight1,215 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,425 mmWheelbase1,460 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height810 mmSeat Height810 mm
Kerb Weight (with ABS)Kerb Weight (with ABS)201 kgKerb Weight (with ABS)226 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity14 lFuel Tank Capacity19 l
RangeRange285 kmRange358 km
Combined CO2 emissionsCombined CO2 emissions112 g/kmCombined CO2 emissions143 g/km
Combined fuel consumptionCombined fuel consumption4.9 l/100kmCombined fuel consumption6.1 l/100km

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Triumph Daytona 660 2024

Triumph Daytona 660 2024

The Triumph Daytona 660 presents itself as a versatile sports motorbike that impresses both on the road and when touring at length. With its characteristic three-cylinder engine, it offers impressive power and a wide range of revs to suit both beginners and experienced riders. The comfortable seating position and well-tuned suspension ensure a pleasant riding experience, while high-quality controls and a light clutch make handling easy. Despite points of criticism, such as the lack of a standard quickshifter and slight vibrations, the Daytona 660 offers a balanced overall package that successfully combines sportiness and comfort.

Powerful engine

Comfortable seating position

Good suspension

High quality controls

Easy handling

Excellent sound

Attractive design

No standard quickshifter

Soft shift linkage Slight vibrations

Suzuki GSX-S1000GT 2022

Suzuki GSX-S1000GT 2022

The Grand Touring variant of the GSX-S combines the super-sporty genes of the model series with an astonishing amount of touring potential. The top chassis and the bombastic engine guarantee riding fun. At the same time, the ergonomics are versatile enough to allow for relaxed stages. As a true sport tourer, the Suzuki takes both sport and touring seriously and manages this compromise extremely well. Only the gear ratio could be a little shorter for country road use and technocrats might miss lean angle-dependent systems. Apart from that, however, the GSX-S GT offers lush equipment and a well-rounded overall package.

Awesome engine with lots of torque from the middle

Stable chassis

Versatile ergonomics

Good sound

Top quickshifter

Good price-performance ratio

Rather long gear ratio

Windshield not adjustable

No lean angle sensor

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Triumph Daytona 660 vs Suzuki GSX-S1000GT

Price Triumph Daytona 660

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Suzuki GSX-S1000GT

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons