Kawasaki Ninja H2 2015 vs. MV Agusta F3 675 2013

Kawasaki Ninja H2 2015

Kawasaki Ninja H2 2015

MV Agusta F3 675 2013

MV Agusta F3 675 2013

Loading...

Overview - Kawasaki Ninja H2 2015 vs MV Agusta F3 675 2013

Kawasaki Ninja H2 2015

Kawasaki Ninja H2 2015

MV Agusta F3 675 2013

MV Agusta F3 675 2013

Technical Specifications Kawasaki Ninja H2 2015 compared to MV Agusta F3 675 2013

Kawasaki Ninja H2 2015
MV Agusta F3 675 2013

Engine and Drive Train

BoreBore76 mmBore79 mm
StrokeStroke55 mmStroke45.9 mm
Engine powerEngine power200 HPEngine power126 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power11,000 rpmRpm at Max. Power14,400 rpm
TorqueTorque133.5 NmTorque71 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque10,500 rpmRpm at Torque10,600 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio8.5 Compression Ratio13
StarterStarterElectricStarterElectric
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders4Cylinders3
Valves per cylinderValves per cylinder4Valves per cylinder4
DisplacementDisplacement998 ccmDisplacement675 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionTelescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork

Suspension Rear

SuspensionSuspensionSingle swing armSuspensionSingle swing arm

Chassis

FrameFrameSteelFrameAluminium
Frame typeFrame typeTubularFrame typeTubular

Brakes Front

PistonPistonFour pistonsPistonFour pistons

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
PistonPistonDouble pistonPistonDouble piston

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width200 mmRear tyre width180 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height55 %Rear tyre height55 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,085 mmLength2,060 mm
WidthWidth770 mmWidth725 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,455 mmWheelbase1,380 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height825 mmSeat Height812 mm
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity17 lFuel Tank Capacity16 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Kawasaki Ninja H2 2015

Kawasaki Ninja H2 2015

The Ninja H2 represents a milestone in motorbike history. It is not only packed with electronic innovations, but also offers completely new technologies in terms of engine construction and mechanics. This high-tech research object of a Japanese technology company is actually for sale and can also be ridden. Basically, it rides like a normal motorbike, only with considerably more power. At first, the engine response is a challenge, but speed freaks will find a way to ride and enjoy this fascinating motorbike.

Outstanding build quality

fascinating engine with mechanical turbocharger

pull, acceleration and speed on a completely new level

narrow seat ensures safe standing - even for smaller riders

great stability

motorbike inspires a lot of confidence despite high performance

strong brakes

high-quality details

Response behaviour in the transition from pushing mode to acceleration phase not at the level of "normal" motorbikes

understeer in fast bends

from body height 185 cm it could be difficult to integrate the feet into the overall aerodynamic concept - test seat!

MV Agusta F3 675 2013

MV Agusta F3 675 2013

If there is anything at all positive to be gained from this completely botched engine tuning, it is that you can experience what it felt like to ride a sporty motorbike in the good old days. But I don't think those days were that good.

Both a city bike and a race bike

sophisticated sound

problematic engine

aggressive brakes.

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Kawasaki Ninja H2 vs MV Agusta F3 675

Price Kawasaki Ninja H2

Unfortunately, the data available to us is not sufficient to provide meaningful price information for this model.

Price MV Agusta F3 675

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons