Husaberg FS 650 E 2005 vs. SWM SM 500 R 2016

Husaberg FS 650 E 2005

Husaberg FS 650 E 2005

SWM SM 500 R 2016

SWM SM 500 R 2016

Loading...

Overview - Husaberg FS 650 E 2005 vs SWM SM 500 R 2016

Husaberg FS 650 E 2005

Husaberg FS 650 E 2005

SWM SM 500 R 2016

SWM SM 500 R 2016

Technical Specifications Husaberg FS 650 E 2005 compared to SWM SM 500 R 2016

Husaberg FS 650 E 2005
SWM SM 500 R 2016

Engine and Drive Train

TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
CylindersCylinders1Cylinders1
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement628 ccmDisplacement501 ccm

Dimensions and Weights

WheelbaseWheelbase1,481 mmWheelbase1,485 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height870 mmSeat Height920 mm
Dry WeightDry Weight112 kgDry Weight120.5 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity9 lFuel Tank Capacity7.2 l

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Husaberg FS 650 E 2005

Husaberg FS 650 E 2005

The connoisseur can't stop marvelling at the Husaberg when looking at it. This is not only evident in the purchase price of almost 10,000 euros, but also in the spare parts prices for these noble add-on parts. However, the Berg also offers a famously radical riding experience.

Uncompromising racing iron

tough sound

light weight

engine power

chassis

braking

handling.

Noise, vibrations and spontaneous engine overwhelming for beginners

price

reliability

starting behaviour

SWM SM 500 R 2016

SWM SM 500 R 2016

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Husaberg FS 650 E vs SWM SM 500 R

Price Husaberg FS 650 E

Model year
Current average market prices

Price SWM SM 500 R

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH