Husqvarna SM 510R 2010 vs. Husqvarna SM 511 R 2012

Husqvarna SM 510R 2010

Husqvarna SM 510R 2010

Husqvarna SM 511 R 2012

Husqvarna SM 511 R 2012

Loading...

Overview - Husqvarna SM 510R 2010 vs Husqvarna SM 511 R 2012

Husqvarna SM 510R 2010

Husqvarna SM 510R 2010

Husqvarna SM 511 R 2012

Husqvarna SM 511 R 2012

Technical Specifications Husqvarna SM 510R 2010 compared to Husqvarna SM 511 R 2012

Husqvarna SM 510R 2010
Husqvarna SM 511 R 2012

Engine and Drive Train

BoreBore97 mmBore101 mm
StrokeStroke67.8 mmStroke59.6 mm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio12.9 Compression Ratio12
StarterStarterElectricStarterElectric
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
CylindersCylinders1Cylinders1
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
DisplacementDisplacement501 ccmDisplacement477 ccm

Suspension Front

BrandBrandMarzocchiBrandKayaba

Suspension Rear

BrandBrandMarzocchiBrandKayaba

Brakes Front

TechnologyTechnologyWaveTechnologyWave

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width150 mmRear tyre width150 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height60 %Rear tyre height60 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
WheelbaseWheelbase1,445 mmWheelbase1,460 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height920 mmSeat Height915 mm
Dry WeightDry Weight120.5 kgDry Weight118 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity7.2 lFuel Tank Capacity8.5 l

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH