Yamaha XMAX 300 2021 vs. Royal Enfield Interceptor 650 2023

Yamaha XMAX 300 2021

Royal Enfield Interceptor 650 2023
Loading...
Technical Specifications Yamaha XMAX 300 2021 compared to Royal Enfield Interceptor 650 2023
Yamaha XMAX 300 2021
Royal Enfield Interceptor 650 2023
Engine and Drive Train
Bore | Bore | 70 mm | Bore | 78 mm |
---|---|---|---|---|
Stroke | Stroke | 75.8 mm | Stroke | 67.8 mm |
Engine power | Engine power | 28 HP | Engine power | 48 HP |
Torque | Torque | 29 Nm | Torque | 52.3 Nm |
Rpm at Torque | Rpm at Torque | 5,750 rpm | Rpm at Torque | 5,150 rpm |
Compression Ratio | Compression Ratio | 10.9 | Compression Ratio | 9.5 |
Fuel system | Fuel system | Injection | Fuel system | Injection |
Starter | Starter | Electric | Starter | Electric, Kick |
Clutch Type | Clutch Type | Centrifugal force | Clutch Type | Multiplate in oil-bath |
Ignition | Ignition | Transistor | Ignition | Digital |
Transmission Type | Transmission Type | Automatic | Transmission Type | Gearshift |
Cylinders | Cylinders | 1 | Cylinders | 2 |
Strokes | Strokes | 4-Stroke | Strokes | 4-Stroke |
Valves | Valves | OHC | Valves | OHV |
Cooling | Cooling | liquid | Cooling | Oil-air |
Displacement | Displacement | 292 ccm | Displacement | 648 ccm |
Suspension Front
Front suspension | Front suspension | Telescopic fork | Front suspension | Telescopic fork |
---|---|---|---|---|
Travel | Travel | 110 mm | Travel | 130 mm |
Suspension Rear
Suspension | Suspension | Unit Swing | Suspension | Swing arm |
---|---|---|---|---|
Shock absorber | Shock absorber | Dual Shock | Shock absorber | Dual Shock |
Travel | Travel | 79 mm | Travel | 120 mm |
Chassis
Frame | Frame | Aluminium | Frame | Steel |
---|
Brakes Front
Type | Type | Single disk | Type | Single disk |
---|---|---|---|---|
Diameter | Diameter | 267 mm | Diameter | 320 mm |
Brakes Rear
Type | Type | Disc | Type | Disc |
---|---|---|---|---|
Diameter | Diameter | 245 mm | Diameter | 240 mm |
Assistance Systems
Advanced Rider Assistance Systems | Advanced Rider Assistance Systems | ABS | Advanced Rider Assistance Systems | ABS |
---|
Dimensions and Weights
Front tyre width | Front tyre width | 120 mm | Front tyre width | 100 mm |
---|---|---|---|---|
Front tyre height | Front tyre height | 70 % | Front tyre height | 90 % |
Front tyre diameter | Front tyre diameter | 15 inch | Front tyre diameter | 18 inch |
Rear tyre width | Rear tyre width | 140 mm | Rear tyre width | 130 mm |
Rear tyre height | Rear tyre height | 70 % | Rear tyre height | 70 % |
Rear tyre diameter | Rear tyre diameter | 14 inch | Rear tyre diameter | 18 inch |
Length | Length | 2,185 mm | Length | 2,119 mm |
Width | Width | 775 mm | Width | 788 mm |
Height | Height | 1,415 mm | Height | 1,120 mm |
Wheelbase | Wheelbase | 1,540 mm | Wheelbase | 1,398 mm |
Seat Height | Seat Height | 795 mm | Seat Height | 805 mm |
Kerb Weight (with ABS) | Kerb Weight (with ABS) | 180 kg | Kerb Weight (with ABS) | 217 kg |
Fuel Tank Capacity | Fuel Tank Capacity | 13 l | Fuel Tank Capacity | 13.7 l |
License compliancy | License compliancy | A2 | License compliancy | A2 |
Range | Range | 433 km | Range | 343 km |
Combined CO2 emissions | Combined CO2 emissions | 70 g/km | Combined CO2 emissions | 99 g/km |
Combined fuel consumption | Combined fuel consumption | 3 l/100km | Combined fuel consumption | 4.21 l/100km |
Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Yamaha XMAX 300 vs Royal Enfield Interceptor 650
Price Yamaha XMAX 300
Model year
Current average market prices
Price Royal Enfield Interceptor 650
Model year
Current average market prices