Yamaha MT-03 2013 vs. Royal Enfield Continental GT 650 2018

Yamaha MT-03 2013

Yamaha MT-03 2013

Royal Enfield Continental GT 650 2018

Royal Enfield Continental GT 650 2018

Loading...

Overview - Yamaha MT-03 2013 vs Royal Enfield Continental GT 650 2018

Yamaha MT-03 2013

Yamaha MT-03 2013

Royal Enfield Continental GT 650 2018

Royal Enfield Continental GT 650 2018

Technical Specifications Yamaha MT-03 2013 compared to Royal Enfield Continental GT 650 2018

Yamaha MT-03 2013
Royal Enfield Continental GT 650 2018

Engine and Drive Train

BoreBore100 mmBore78 mm
StrokeStroke84 mmStroke67.8 mm
Engine powerEngine power48 HPEngine power47 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power6,250 rpmRpm at Max. Power7,100 rpm
TorqueTorque56.2 NmTorque52 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque5,500 rpmRpm at Torque4,000 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio10 Compression Ratio9.5
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Number of gearsNumber of gears5Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders1Cylinders2
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingOil-air
DisplacementDisplacement660 ccmDisplacement648 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionTelescopic forkFront suspensionTelescopic fork

Chassis

Frame typeFrame typeTubularFrame typeLoad-bearing engine

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeSingle disk

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width100 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height90 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter18 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width160 mmRear tyre width130 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height60 %Rear tyre height70 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter18 inch
LengthLength2,070 mmLength2,122 mm
WidthWidth860 mmWidth744 mm
HeightHeight1,115 mmHeight1,024 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,420 mmWheelbase1,400 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height805 mmSeat Height790 mm
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity15 lFuel Tank Capacity12.5 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyA2License compliancyA2

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Yamaha MT-03 2013

Yamaha MT-03 2013

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.

Royal Enfield Continental GT 650 2018

Royal Enfield Continental GT 650 2018

Visually, the new Royal Enfield Continental GT 650 is closely related to its single-cylinder sister Continental GT 535, but technically it takes a huge step forward. The parallel twin-cylinder engine with 48 hp and 53 Newton metres of torque is lively and refined, the handling is surprisingly stable and the brakes are also convincing. Electronic features are in vain, but the wonderful cafe racer look remains absolutely authentic. The price should also be set so low in Europe that Royal Enfield should no longer be a quirky exotic.

Agile and refined powerplant

cool two-cylinder sound

comfortable seating position

stable handling

good brakes

wonderful old school look

reasonable price

classic round instruments.

ABS not quite sensitive, no electronic features - in case anyone needs them...

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Yamaha MT-03 vs Royal Enfield Continental GT 650

Price Yamaha MT-03

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Royal Enfield Continental GT 650

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH