Husqvarna WR 250 2008 vs. Husqvarna FE 350 2016

Husqvarna WR 250 2008

Husqvarna WR 250 2008

Husqvarna FE 350 2016

Husqvarna FE 350 2016

Loading...

Overview - Husqvarna WR 250 2008 vs Husqvarna FE 350 2016

Husqvarna WR 250 2008

Husqvarna WR 250 2008

Husqvarna FE 350 2016

Husqvarna FE 350 2016

Technical Specifications Husqvarna WR 250 2008 compared to Husqvarna FE 350 2016

Husqvarna WR 250 2008
Husqvarna FE 350 2016

Engine and Drive Train

TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
CylindersCylinders1Cylinders1
StrokesStrokes2-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
DisplacementDisplacement249 ccmDisplacement349.7 ccm

Dimensions and Weights

WheelbaseWheelbase1,465 mmWheelbase1,482 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height965 mmSeat Height970 mm
Dry WeightDry Weight108 kgDry Weight109.2 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity10.2 lFuel Tank Capacity9.5 l

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Husqvarna WR 250 2008

Husqvarna WR 250 2008

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.

Husqvarna FE 350 2016

Husqvarna FE 350 2016

The universal bike from Husky, it can do practically everything. And as something in between the 250 and 450, it combines the advantages of both models. It has also become somewhat stronger in 2017 and is now more comparable to the 450 in terms of responsiveness.

Probably the fastest machine on any special stage

great balance between easy handling and good performance.

Clearly more aggressive than the FE250 and therefore also more energy-consuming

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Husqvarna WR 250 vs Husqvarna FE 350

Price Husqvarna WR 250

Unfortunately, the data available to us is not sufficient to provide meaningful price information for this model.

Price Husqvarna FE 350

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH