KTM 300 EXC 2017 vs. Beta RR 250 4T 2009

KTM 300 EXC 2017

KTM 300 EXC 2017

Beta RR 250 4T 2009

Beta RR 250 4T 2009

Loading...

Technical Specifications KTM 300 EXC 2017 compared to Beta RR 250 4T 2009

KTM 300 EXC 2017
Beta RR 250 4T 2009

Engine and Drive Train

StrokeStroke72 mmStroke105 mm
StarterStarterElectric, KickStarterElectric
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
CylindersCylinders1Cylinders1
StrokesStrokes2-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke

Chassis

FrameFrameSteelFrameSteel
Frame typeFrame typeCentral tubeFrame typeDouble cradle

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter21 inchFront tyre diameter21 inch
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter18 inchRear tyre diameter18 inch
WheelbaseWheelbase1,482 mmWheelbase1,490 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height960 mmSeat Height940 mm
Dry WeightDry Weight100 kgDry Weight117 kg

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

KTM 300 EXC 2017

KTM 300 EXC 2017

Although the 1000PS Offroad Crew found a few weak points, all testers were enthusiastic about the KTM 300 EXC. Its single-cylinder has good responsiveness and is very easy to ride thanks to its power. The chassis offers a solid basic setup ex works, even if it is a bit top-heavy according to our pros. In addition, many parts, such as the fan, have to be bought from KTM accessories, so the bill will be a little higher.

good responsiveness

solid chassis setup

Important parts subject to surcharge

Beta RR 250 4T 2009

Beta RR 250 4T 2009

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price KTM 300 EXC vs Beta RR 250 4T

Price KTM 300 EXC

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Beta RR 250 4T

Unfortunately, the data available to us is not sufficient to provide meaningful price information for this model.

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH