Suzuki B-King 2009 vs. BMW S 1000 R 2023

Suzuki B-King 2009

Suzuki B-King 2009

BMW S 1000 R 2023

BMW S 1000 R 2023

Loading...

Overview - Suzuki B-King 2009 vs BMW S 1000 R 2023

Suzuki B-King 2009

Suzuki B-King 2009

BMW S 1000 R 2023

BMW S 1000 R 2023

Technical Specifications Suzuki B-King 2009 compared to BMW S 1000 R 2023

Suzuki B-King 2009
BMW S 1000 R 2023

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeIn line
BoreBore81 mmBore80 mm
StrokeStroke65 mmStroke49.7 mm
Engine powerEngine power135 HPEngine power165 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power9,500 rpmRpm at Max. Power11,000 rpm
TorqueTorque146 NmTorque114 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque7,200 rpmRpm at Torque9,250 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio12.5 Compression Ratio12.5
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders4Cylinders4
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
ValvesValvesDOHCValvesDOHC, Drag lever
DisplacementDisplacement1,340 ccmDisplacement999 ccm

Chassis

FrameFrameAluminiumFrameAluminium
Frame typeFrame typeTwin-SparFrame typeTwin Tube

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeDouble disk
PistonPistonFour pistonsPistonFour pistons
TechnologyTechnologyradialTechnologyradial

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
PistonPistonDouble pistonPistonSingle piston

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width200 mmRear tyre width190 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height50 %Rear tyre height55 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,220 mmLength2,090 mm
WidthWidth800 mmWidth812 mm
HeightHeight1,085 mmHeight1,115 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,525 mmWheelbase1,450 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height805 mmSeat Height830 mm
Kerb Weight (with ABS)Kerb Weight (with ABS)259 kgKerb Weight (with ABS)199 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity16.5 lFuel Tank Capacity16.5 l
Top SpeedTop Speed247 km/hTop Speed200 km/h
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Suzuki B-King 2009

Suzuki B-King 2009

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.

BMW S 1000 R 2023

BMW S 1000 R 2023

The seating position is sporty, but by no means uncomfortable, the brakes are powerful and the engine of the S 1000 R is at its best - perhaps even a little too homogeneous. There is also nothing to complain about on the riding side. Based on the pure performance data and the installed electronic features, the BMW probably has what it takes for the fastest lap time. And that on any kind of surface, because with the semi-active suspension you can eat up kilometre after kilometre on bad roads littered with potholes. Unfortunately, this feeling of superiority never really spilled over to the driver. Probably the downside of too much balance in all areas - at least in my Italophile eyes. The BMW lacked that certain something, the charisma, which is difficult to explain but arouses genuine emotions.

powerful engine

strong brakes

comfortable ergonomics

good standard equipment

extensive range of accessories

Sluggish shift assistant

optics not 100% coherent

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Suzuki B-King vs BMW S 1000 R

Price Suzuki B-King

Model year
Current average market prices

Price BMW S 1000 R

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH