Magazine
Brands
Top Awards
Compare
About us
Home
Compare
Beta Evo 300 2T 2014 vs. Beta Evo 290 2T 2011
TGB Blade 550 LT 4x4 IRS 2010 vs. Can-Am Outlander 650 2009
TGB Blade 550 LT 4x4 IRS 2010
Can-Am Outlander 650 2009
Loading...
Technical Specifications TGB Blade 550 LT 4x4 IRS 2010 compared to Can-Am Outlander 650 2009
TGB Blade 550 LT 4x4 IRS 2010
Can-Am Outlander 650 2009
Show all
Same only
Differences
TGB Blade 550 LT 4x4 IRS 2010
Can-Am Outlander 650 2009
Engine and Drive Train
Bore
Bore
92 mm
Bore
82 mm
Stroke
Stroke
75.6 mm
Stroke
62 mm
Displacement
Displacement
503 ccm
Displacement
650 ccm
Brakes Rear
Type
Type
Disc
Type
Disc
Dimensions and Weights
Seat Height
Seat Height
920 mm
Seat Height
877 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity
Fuel Tank Capacity
18 l
Fuel Tank Capacity
20 l
Alternative Comparisons
VS.
CFMOTO CForce 520 EFI 4×4 2017 vs
TGB Blade 550 LT 4x4 IRS 2013
VS.
Arctic Cat Alterra 400 4x4 2018 vs
TGB Blade 550 LT 4x4 IRS 2012
VS.
TGB Blade 550 LT 4x4 IRS 2010 vs
TGB Blade 550 FL Edition Touring LOF 2021
VS.
TGB Blade 550 LT 4x4 IRS 2015 vs
TGB Blade 1000 LT FL EPS MAX 2022
VS.
Arctic Cat 550i 4x4 2012 vs
TGB Blade 550 LT 4x4 IRS 2012
VS.
TGB Blade 550 4x4 IRS 2014 vs
TGB Blade 550 LT 4x4 IRS 2010
VS.
TGB Blade 550 LT 4x4 IRS 2010 vs
Yamaha Kodiak 700 EPS SE 2019
VS.
CFMOTO CFORCE 625 DL 4X4 EPS LOF 2022 vs
Can-Am Outlander 650 2009
VS.
TGB Blade 550 LT 4x4 IRS 2012 vs
TGB Blade 600 EFI LT 4x4 EPS IRS 2018
VS.
Kymco MXU 550i T Offroad 2020 vs
TGB Blade 550 LT 4x4 IRS 2017
VS.
TGB Target 550 4x4 IRS 2012 vs
Can-Am Outlander 650 2009
VS.
CFMOTO CForce 450 EFI 4x4 S One 2022 vs
TGB Blade 550 LT 4x4 IRS 2010
VS.
TGB Blade 550 LT 4x4 IRS 2015 vs
CFMOTO Everest 500 4×4 2012
