Triumph Sprint GT 2013 vs. BMW R 1250 RS 2020

Triumph Sprint GT 2013

Triumph Sprint GT 2013

BMW R 1250 RS 2020

BMW R 1250 RS 2020

Loading...

Overview - Triumph Sprint GT 2013 vs BMW R 1250 RS 2020

Triumph Sprint GT 2013

Triumph Sprint GT 2013

BMW R 1250 RS 2020

BMW R 1250 RS 2020

Technical Specifications Triumph Sprint GT 2013 compared to BMW R 1250 RS 2020

Triumph Sprint GT 2013
BMW R 1250 RS 2020

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeBoxer
BoreBore79 mmBore102.5 mm
StrokeStroke71.4 mmStroke76 mm
Engine powerEngine power130 HPEngine power136 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power9,200 rpmRpm at Max. Power7,750 rpm
TorqueTorque108 NmTorque143 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque6,300 rpmRpm at Torque6,250 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio12 Compression Ratio12.5
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeAntihopping
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionProp shaft
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders3Cylinders2
Valves per cylinderValves per cylinder4Valves per cylinder4
ValvesValvesDOHCValvesDOHC
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid-air
DisplacementDisplacement1,050 ccmDisplacement1,254 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionTelescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork

Chassis

Frame typeFrame typeTwin TubeFrame typeLoad-bearing engine

Brakes Front

PistonPistonFour pistonsPistonFour pistons

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
PistonPistonDouble pistonPistonDouble piston
Shock mountShock mountFloating caliperShock mountFloating caliper

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width180 mmRear tyre width180 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height55 %Rear tyre height55 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,260 mmLength2,202 mm
WidthWidth760 mmWidth925 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,537 mmWheelbase1,530 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height815 mmSeat Height820 mm
Kerb Weight (with ABS)Kerb Weight (with ABS)265 kgKerb Weight (with ABS)243 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity20 lFuel Tank Capacity18 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Triumph Sprint GT 2013

Triumph Sprint GT 2013

However, satisfied ST riders should not rush to the nearest Triumph dealer. The GT is not really a successor. Those who love the ST just as much as they do may not be any happier with the GT. But those who are looking for an "ST" with more travel comfort and practical utility will find what they are looking for with the GT.

Increased comfort

more practical utility

optimal seating position

practical

comfortable

efficient wind protection

very fast

ABS.

High overall weight

top case, raised windshield and heated grips can only be purchased separately.

BMW R 1250 RS 2020

BMW R 1250 RS 2020

A great engine in a pretty dress is not everything. The standard equipment of the BMW R 1250 RS is disappointing; neither quickshifter nor cruise control are included, which is no longer in keeping with the times in 2021. Ergonomically, the Bavarian can be adapted to almost any rider. The ESA suspension is great and a must-have extra, especially when there are two of you. In tight bends, the RS's weight is indisputable; here it seems almost sluggish. The wider the radii, the more confident you are on the BMW. Wind and weather protection are good, although a slightly higher windshield would be desirable.

High stability in long radii

agile, high-revving boxer engine

good looks

comfortable seating position

extensive list of accessories

great ESA chassis.

High weight noticeable in tight bends

windshield could be higher

many compulsory features at extra cost

somewhat sluggish

Price Comparison Average Market Price Triumph Sprint GT vs BMW R 1250 RS

Price Triumph Sprint GT

Model year
Current average market prices

Price BMW R 1250 RS

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons