Husqvarna SM 610 2005 vs. Husqvarna TE 450 2009

Husqvarna SM 610 2005

Husqvarna SM 610 2005

Husqvarna TE 450 2009

Husqvarna TE 450 2009

Loading...

Overview - Husqvarna SM 610 2005 vs Husqvarna TE 450 2009

Husqvarna SM 610 2005

Husqvarna SM 610 2005

Husqvarna TE 450 2009

Husqvarna TE 450 2009

Technical Specifications Husqvarna SM 610 2005 compared to Husqvarna TE 450 2009

Husqvarna SM 610 2005
Husqvarna TE 450 2009

Engine and Drive Train

CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement576 ccmDisplacement449 ccm

Dimensions and Weights

WheelbaseWheelbase1,500 mmWheelbase1,495 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height920 mmSeat Height963 mm
Dry WeightDry Weight140 kgDry Weight112 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity12.5 lFuel Tank Capacity7.2 l

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Husqvarna SM 610 2005

Husqvarna SM 610 2005

The Husky is by no means an inexpensive entry-level bike. However, single-cylinder enthusiasts looking for power, a great chassis and civil service intervals have come to the right place with the Husky. A good iron!

Optimal chassis

independent geometry

linear steering feel

high-quality fork

qualitative workmanship.

Hakelige ignition lock seems to have been reworked cheaply

high price

not suitable for long-distance travel

spare parts supply problematic.

Husqvarna TE 450 2009

Husqvarna TE 450 2009

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Husqvarna SM 610 vs Husqvarna TE 450

Price Husqvarna SM 610

Unfortunately, the data available to us is not sufficient to provide meaningful price information for this model.

Price Husqvarna TE 450

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH