Husqvarna WR 300 2009 vs. Yamaha MT-07 2015

Husqvarna WR 300 2009

Husqvarna WR 300 2009

Yamaha MT-07 2015

Yamaha MT-07 2015

Loading...

Technical Specifications Husqvarna WR 300 2009 compared to Yamaha MT-07 2015

Husqvarna WR 300 2009
Yamaha MT-07 2015

Engine and Drive Train

BoreBore72 mmBore80 mm
StrokeStroke72 mmStroke68.6 mm
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement293 ccmDisplacement689 ccm

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter21 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter18 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
WheelbaseWheelbase1,465 mmWheelbase1,400 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height975 mmSeat Height805 mm
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity9.5 lFuel Tank Capacity14 l

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Husqvarna WR 300 2009

Husqvarna WR 300 2009

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.

Yamaha MT-07 2015

Yamaha MT-07 2015

Even after three years, the Yamaha MT-07 is still a public favourite. No one else beats such a price-performance ratio. The two-cylinder engine is powerful, but can be dosed very gently at low revs. The display is also one of the best in this class, with good readability. Only the chassis is disappointing. In a sporty riding style, it is simply too soft, which can cause the MT-07 to sway.

great motor

easy to read display

low price

Chassis too soft

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Husqvarna WR 300 vs Yamaha MT-07

Price Husqvarna WR 300

Unfortunately, the data available to us is not sufficient to provide meaningful price information for this model.

Price Yamaha MT-07

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons