Kawasaki Ninja ZX-6R 636 2013 vs. Honda CBR650R 2019

Kawasaki Ninja ZX-6R 636 2013

Kawasaki Ninja ZX-6R 636 2013

Honda CBR650R 2019

Honda CBR650R 2019

Loading...

Overview - Kawasaki Ninja ZX-6R 636 2013 vs Honda CBR650R 2019

The Kawasaki Ninja ZX-6R 636 2013 and the Honda CBR650R 2019 are both supersport motorcycles that offer impressive performance and features. However, there are some notable differences between the two models.

Starting with the engine and drive train, both motorcycles have an inline four-cylinder engine with a bore of 67 mm. The Kawasaki Ninja ZX-6R 636 has a stroke of 45.1 mm, while the Honda CBR650R has a slightly longer stroke of 46 mm. In terms of power, the Ninja ZX-6R 636 boasts 131 HP, while the CBR650R offers 95 HP. The torque figures are also different, with the Ninja ZX-6R 636 producing 71 Nm compared to the CBR650R's 64 Nm. The compression ratio of the Ninja ZX-6R 636 is higher at 12.9, compared to the CBR650R's 11.4. Both motorcycles have four cylinders and a displacement of around 636 ccm for the Ninja ZX-6R 636 and 649 ccm for the CBR650R.

Moving on to the suspension, both motorcycles feature upside-down telescopic forks at the front. However, the Ninja ZX-6R 636 offers more adjustability with compression, preload, and rebound adjustments at the rear, while the CBR650R only has preload adjustment. The chassis of the Ninja ZX-6R 636 is made of aluminum and has a twin tube, perimeter, extruded frame, while the CBR650R has a steel frame with a twin tube design.

Kawasaki Ninja ZX-6R 636 2013

Kawasaki Ninja ZX-6R 636 2013

In terms of braking, both motorcycles have double disk brakes at the front. The Ninja ZX-6R 636 features radial, monoblock, petal technology for its front brakes, while the CBR650R has wave technology. Both motorcycles also have advanced rider assistance systems, with the Ninja ZX-6R 636 offering traction control and the CBR650R featuring ABS.

In terms of dimensions and weights, both motorcycles have a front tire width of 120 mm and a rear tire width of 180 mm, with a diameter of 17 inches for both. The wheelbase of the Ninja ZX-6R 636 is 1395 mm, while the CBR650R has a longer wheelbase of 1450 mm. The seat height of the Ninja ZX-6R 636 is 830 mm, compared to the CBR650R's 810 mm. The Ninja ZX-6R 636 has a kerb weight of 194 kg with ABS, while the CBR650R is slightly heavier at 208 kg. The fuel tank capacity of the Ninja ZX-6R 636 is 17 liters, while the CBR650R has a slightly smaller capacity of 15.4 liters.

Honda CBR650R 2019

Honda CBR650R 2019

In terms of strengths, the Kawasaki Ninja ZX-6R 636 2013 offers sharpened geometry, a comfortable seating position, good handling, and uncompromising reliability. On the other hand, the Honda CBR650R 2019 has a very elastic four-cylinder engine, sufficient comfort for longer tours, good wind protection, great looks, and is easy to operate. Additionally, the CBR650R is A2 suitable, making it accessible to a wider range of riders.

However, there are also some weaknesses to consider. The Kawasaki Ninja ZX-6R 636 2013 has a high purchase price, which may be a deterrent for some buyers. The Honda CBR650R 2019 has been reported to have a drone below 4,500 rpm, and the suspension could be a touch sportier. Additionally, some riders have noted issues with the rear brake on the CBR650R.

In conclusion, both the Kawasaki Ninja ZX-6R 636 2013 and the Honda CBR650R 2019 are impressive supersport motorcycles with their own strengths and weaknesses. The Ninja ZX-6R 636 offers a higher power output and more adjustability in the suspension, while the CBR650R provides a more comfortable riding experience and A2 suitability. Ultimately, the choice between the two will depend on the rider's preferences and priorities.

Technical Specifications Kawasaki Ninja ZX-6R 636 2013 compared to Honda CBR650R 2019

Kawasaki Ninja ZX-6R 636 2013
Honda CBR650R 2019

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeIn line
BoreBore67 mmBore67 mm
StrokeStroke45.1 mmStroke46 mm
Engine powerEngine power131 HPEngine power95 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power13,500 rpmRpm at Max. Power11,000 rpm
TorqueTorque71 NmTorque64 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque11,500 rpmRpm at Torque8,000 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio12.9 Compression Ratio11.4
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
IgnitionIgnitionDigitalIgnitionDigital, Transistor
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders4Cylinders4
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement636 ccmDisplacement649 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork

Suspension Rear

AdjustmentAdjustmentCompression, Preload, ReboundAdjustmentPreload

Chassis

FrameFrameAluminiumFrameSteel
Frame typeFrame typeTwin Tube, Perimeter, ExtrudedFrame typeTwin Tube

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeDouble disk
PistonPistonFour pistonsPistonDouble piston
TechnologyTechnologyradial, Monoblock, PetalTechnologyWave

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
PistonPistonSingle pistonPistonSingle piston

Assistance Systems

Advanced Rider Assistance SystemsAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsTraction controlAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABS

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width180 mmRear tyre width180 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height55 %Rear tyre height55 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,085 mmLength2,110 mm
WidthWidth705 mmWidth755 mm
HeightHeight1,115 mmHeight1,145 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,395 mmWheelbase1,450 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height830 mmSeat Height810 mm
Kerb Weight (with ABS)Kerb Weight (with ABS)194 kgKerb Weight (with ABS)208 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity17 lFuel Tank Capacity15.4 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Kawasaki Ninja ZX-6R 636 2013

Kawasaki Ninja ZX-6R 636 2013

The Kawa convinces with its good handling and uncompromising reliability. A strong motorbike, but definitely not a bargain.

Sharpened geometry

seating position okay

good handling

uncompromising reliability.

High purchase price.

Honda CBR650R 2019

Honda CBR650R 2019

The new CBR650R takes the spirit we know from classic four-cylinder sports tourers and brings it into the modern era. Thanks to the good engine tuning, you don't have to worry about being left behind by your two-cylinder friends, especially as you are rewarded with a lovely sound across the rev range. Unfortunately, however, there can be too much sound, as the roar below 4,500 rpm proved. On the chassis and seating position side, a compromise has been found that allows the CBR650R to cope well with everyday riding, as well as longer tours and house track hunts.

very elastic four-cylinder

sufficient comfort for longer tours

good wind protection

great looks

easy to operate

A2 suitable

Drone below 4,500 rpm

Suspension could be a touch sportier

Rear brake

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Kawasaki Ninja ZX-6R 636 vs Honda CBR650R

There are a few key differences between a Kawasaki Ninja ZX-6R 636 2013 and a Honda CBR650R 2019. It takes less time to sell a Honda CBR650R with 45 days compared to 122 days for the Kawasaki Ninja ZX-6R 636. Since model year 2013 1000PS.de editors have written 7 reviews for the Kawasaki Ninja ZX-6R 636 and 14 reviews for the Honda CBR650R since model year 2019. The first review for the Kawasaki Ninja ZX-6R 636 was published on 12/3/2012 and now has more than 20,800 views. This compares to more than 53,700 views for the first review on Honda CBR650R published on 10/8/2018.

Price Kawasaki Ninja ZX-6R 636

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Honda CBR650R

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH