Husqvarna FC 350 2015 vs. Husqvarna TE 300 2016

Husqvarna FC 350 2015

Husqvarna FC 350 2015

Husqvarna TE 300 2016

Husqvarna TE 300 2016

Loading...

Technical Specifications Husqvarna FC 350 2015 compared to Husqvarna TE 300 2016

Husqvarna FC 350 2015
Husqvarna TE 300 2016
Husqvarna FC 350 2015
Husqvarna FC 350 2015
Husqvarna TE 300 2016
Husqvarna TE 300 2016

Engine and Drive Train

BoreBore88 mmBore72 mm
StrokeStroke57.5 mmStroke72 mm
StarterStarterElectricStarterElectric, Kick
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
CylindersCylinders1Cylinders1
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes2-Stroke
DisplacementDisplacement349.7 ccmDisplacement293.2 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork
BrandBrandWPBrandWP

Suspension Rear

Shock mountShock mountDeflectionShock mountDeflection
BrandBrandWPBrandWP

Chassis

FrameFrameSteelFrameSteel
Frame typeFrame typeCentral tubeFrame typeCentral tube

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width80 mmFront tyre width90 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height100 %Front tyre height90 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter21 inchFront tyre diameter21 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width110 mmRear tyre width140 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height90 %Rear tyre height80 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter19 inchRear tyre diameter18 inch
WheelbaseWheelbase1,495 mmWheelbase1,482 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height992 mmSeat Height960 mm
Dry WeightDry Weight106.4 kgDry Weight104.6 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity7.5 lFuel Tank Capacity11 l

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Husqvarna FC 350 2015

Husqvarna FC 350 2015

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.

Husqvarna TE 300 2016

Husqvarna TE 300 2016

Completely new engine for 2017! Lighter and quieter thanks to the balancer shaft, the two-stroke has also been lightened, with the 300 now weighing in at 102 kg. The choice for Erzberg, Romaniacs and Co!

Much quieter due to balancer shaft

powerful engine

best balance of weight and performance

I would prefer a four-stroke on smooth and easy tracks

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Husqvarna FC 350 vs Husqvarna TE 300

Price Husqvarna FC 350

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Husqvarna TE 300

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

Husqvarna TE 300 2017
VS.
Husqvarna TE 300i 2018

Husqvarna TE 300 2017 vs
Husqvarna TE 300i 2018

Husqvarna FC 350 2020
VS.
Husqvarna FE 350 2020

Husqvarna FC 350 2020 vs
Husqvarna FE 350 2020

Husqvarna FC 350 2018
VS.
Husqvarna FC 250 2021

Husqvarna FC 350 2018 vs
Husqvarna FC 250 2021

Red Moto CRF 300RX Enduro 2022
VS.
Husqvarna FC 350 2022

Red Moto CRF 300RX Enduro 2022 vs
Husqvarna FC 350 2022

Husqvarna TE 300 2017
VS.
Husqvarna TE 300i 2022

Husqvarna TE 300 2017 vs
Husqvarna TE 300i 2022

Husaberg TE 300 2013
VS.
Husqvarna TE 300 2014

Husaberg TE 300 2013 vs
Husqvarna TE 300 2014

KTM 350 EXC-F 2020
VS.
Husqvarna FC 350 2020

KTM 350 EXC-F 2020 vs
Husqvarna FC 350 2020

Husqvarna TE 300 2015
VS.
Beta RR 300 2T 2015

Husqvarna TE 300 2015 vs
Beta RR 300 2T 2015

Husqvarna FC 350 2017
VS.
KTM 350 SX-F 2021

Husqvarna FC 350 2017 vs
KTM 350 SX-F 2021

KTM 300 EXC TPI 2019
VS.
Husqvarna TE 300 2018

KTM 300 EXC TPI 2019 vs
Husqvarna TE 300 2018

Husaberg FE 350 2013
VS.
Husqvarna FC 350 2014

Husaberg FE 350 2013 vs
Husqvarna FC 350 2014

Husqvarna FC 450 2020
VS.
Husqvarna FC 350 2020

Husqvarna FC 450 2020 vs
Husqvarna FC 350 2020

Husqvarna FC 350 2015
VS.
Husqvarna FC 250 2021

Husqvarna FC 350 2015 vs
Husqvarna FC 250 2021