Kawasaki Ninja 650 2017 vs. Suzuki GSX-R 1000 R 2017

Kawasaki Ninja 650 2017

Kawasaki Ninja 650 2017

Suzuki GSX-R 1000 R 2017

Suzuki GSX-R 1000 R 2017

Loading...

Overview - Kawasaki Ninja 650 2017 vs Suzuki GSX-R 1000 R 2017

The Kawasaki Ninja 650 2017 and the Suzuki GSX-R 1000 R 2017 are both supersport motorcycles with their own unique strengths and weaknesses.

Starting with the Kawasaki Ninja 650 2017, it boasts a transparent chassis that gives it a sporty look. It also has playful and good-natured handling, making it a fun bike to ride. The brakes on the Ninja 650 are excellent, providing strong stopping power. In terms of aesthetics, the Ninja 650 takes inspiration from the ZX-10R, giving it sharp and aggressive looks. The engine on the Ninja 650 is resilient and offers a decent amount of power, with 68.2 HP and 65.7 Nm of torque. However, one weakness of the Ninja 650 is that it lacks sound from the stock exhaust, and the engine can exhibit slight vibrations.

Kawasaki Ninja 650 2017

Kawasaki Ninja 650 2017

On the other hand, the Suzuki GSX-R 1000 R 2017 is known for its high-revving engine. The torque curve on the GSX-R 1000 R is smooth and does not have any noticeable dips, providing a consistent and powerful acceleration. The bike is super stable on corner exit and radius, making it a great choice for riders who enjoy fast tracks. The GSX-R 1000 R also features a great quickshifter, allowing for seamless gear changes. The chassis on the GSX-R 1000 R is made of high-quality aluminum, providing excellent stability and handling. One unique feature of the GSX-R 1000 R is its wheely control, which is linked to the traction control system. However, one weakness of the GSX-R 1000 R is that the engine brake is not adjustable, which may limit the customization options for some riders.

In terms of technical specifications, the Kawasaki Ninja 650 2017 has a 649cc inline twin engine with a bore of 83mm and a stroke of 60mm. It produces 68.2 HP of power and 65.7 Nm of torque. The suspension consists of a telescopic fork in the front and a swing arm with a monoshock in the rear. The brakes are double disk with a diameter of 300mm in the front. The Ninja 650 comes with advanced rider assistance systems such as ABS. It has a wheelbase of 1410mm and a seat height of 790mm. The kerb weight of the Ninja 650 with ABS is 193kg, and it has a fuel tank capacity of 15 liters.

Suzuki GSX-R 1000 R 2017

Suzuki GSX-R 1000 R 2017

On the other hand, the Suzuki GSX-R 1000 R 2017 has a 999cc inline four-cylinder engine with a bore of 76mm and a stroke of 55.1mm. It produces a whopping 202 HP of power and 118 Nm of torque. The suspension consists of an upside-down telescopic fork in the front and a swing arm with a monoshock in the rear. The brakes are double disk with a diameter of 320mm in the front, featuring radial monoblock technology. The GSX-R 1000 R comes with advanced rider assistance systems such as ABS, riding modes, ride by wire, and traction control. It has a wheelbase of 1410mm and a seat height of 825mm. The kerb weight of the GSX-R 1000 R with ABS is 203kg, and it has a fuel tank capacity of 17.5 liters.

In conclusion, the Kawasaki Ninja 650 2017 and the Suzuki GSX-R 1000 R 2017 are both impressive supersport motorcycles with their own unique strengths and weaknesses. The Ninja 650 offers a playful and good-natured riding experience with excellent brakes, while the GSX-R 1000 R provides a high-revving engine and exceptional stability on fast tracks. Ultimately, the choice between the two will depend on the rider's preferences and priorities.

Technical Specifications Kawasaki Ninja 650 2017 compared to Suzuki GSX-R 1000 R 2017

Kawasaki Ninja 650 2017
Suzuki GSX-R 1000 R 2017

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeIn line
BoreBore83 mmBore76 mm
StrokeStroke60 mmStroke55.1 mm
Engine powerEngine power68.2 HPEngine power202 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power8,000 rpmRpm at Max. Power13,200 rpm
TorqueTorque65.7 NmTorque118 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque7,000 rpmRpm at Torque10,800 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio10.8 Compression Ratio13.2
Fuel systemFuel systemInjectionFuel systemInjection
Throttle BoreThrottle Bore36 mmThrottle Bore46 mm
StarterStarterElectricStarterElectric
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Transmission TypeTransmission TypeGearshiftTransmission TypeGearshift
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders2Cylinders4
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
Valves per cylinderValves per cylinder4Valves per cylinder4
ValvesValvesDOHCValvesDOHC
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement649 ccmDisplacement999 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionTelescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork
DiameterDiameter41 mmDiameter43 mm

Suspension Rear

SuspensionSuspensionSwing armSuspensionSwing arm
Shock absorberShock absorberMonoshockShock absorberMonoshock
Shock mountShock mountDeflectionShock mountDeflection
AdjustmentAdjustmentPreloadAdjustmentCompression, Preload, Rebound

Chassis

FrameFrameSteelFrameAluminium
Frame typeFrame typeTubularFrame typeTwin Tube, Twin-Spar
RakeRake65.5 degreeRake66.8 degree
TrailTrail100 mmTrail95 mm

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeDouble disk
DiameterDiameter300 mmDiameter320 mm
PistonPistonDouble pistonPistonFour pistons
TechnologyTechnologyPetalTechnologyradial, Monoblock

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
DiameterDiameter220 mmDiameter220 mm
PistonPistonSingle pistonPistonDouble piston

Assistance Systems

Advanced Rider Assistance SystemsAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABSAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABS, Riding modes, Ride by Wire, Traction control

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width160 mmRear tyre width190 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height60 %Rear tyre height55 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,055 mmLength2,075 mm
WidthWidth740 mmWidth710 mm
HeightHeight1,135 mmHeight1,150 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,410 mmWheelbase1,410 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height790 mmSeat Height825 mm
Kerb Weight (with ABS)Kerb Weight (with ABS)193 kgKerb Weight (with ABS)203 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity15 lFuel Tank Capacity17.5 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Kawasaki Ninja 650 2017

Kawasaki Ninja 650 2017

The Ninja 650 firmly stamps its predecessor (Er-6f). The engine has mastered the Euro 4 hurdle well and serves up a very usable 68 hp, the chassis is simply great for this class, and the weight reduction of 18(!) kilos compared to the ER-6f justifies reverent nods.

Transparent chassis for sport

playful and good-natured handling, excellent brakes, sharp looks a la ZX-10R

resilient engine.

Little sound from the series pot

engine shows slight vibrations

Suzuki GSX-R 1000 R 2017

Suzuki GSX-R 1000 R 2017

Suzuki has done a great job with the GSX-R 1000 R 2017. A powerful motorbike with a fabulously smooth torque curve. Actually unbelievable at 202 hp! The chassis is of high quality and the electronics package has no tinsel but delivers top performance.

High-revving engine

no dents in torque curve

Super stable on corner exit and radius

Great quickshifter

High-quality chassis

Terrific on fast tracks.

Engine brake not adjustable

Wheelycontrol linked to traction control

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Kawasaki Ninja 650 vs Suzuki GSX-R 1000 R

There are a few key differences between a Kawasaki Ninja 650 2017 and a Suzuki GSX-R 1000 R 2017. There are the same number of bikes of both models available on the 1000PS.de marketplace, specifically 7. It takes less time to sell a Kawasaki Ninja 650 with 96 days compared to 176 days for a Suzuki GSX-R 1000 R. Since model year 2017 1000PS.de editors have written 20 reviews for the Kawasaki Ninja 650 and 13 reviews for the Suzuki GSX-R 1000 R since model year 2017. The first review for the Kawasaki Ninja 650 was published on 10/4/2016 and now has more than 79,600 views. This compares to more than 197,700 views for the first review on Suzuki GSX-R 1000 R published on 10/4/2016.

Price Kawasaki Ninja 650

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Suzuki GSX-R 1000 R

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH