BMW R 1300 GS 2024 vs. Suzuki V-Strom 1000 2017

BMW R 1300 GS 2024

BMW R 1300 GS 2024

Suzuki V-Strom 1000 2017

Suzuki V-Strom 1000 2017

Loading...

Overview - BMW R 1300 GS 2024 vs Suzuki V-Strom 1000 2017

The BMW R 1300 GS 2024 and the Suzuki V-Strom 1000 2017 are both enduro motorcycles with their own unique features and strengths.

Starting with the BMW R 1300 GS 2024, it boasts a powerful engine with excellent response behavior, providing a thrilling riding experience. It also offers very good traction and stable handling, making it both agile and cornering-friendly. The motorbike has a practical configuration with options for customization, and the handguards provide surprisingly good wind protection. Even with minimal equipment, the bike appears compact and sporty. It also features well-integrated radar cruise control and an understandable operating concept with an easy-to-read display. The BMW R 1300 GS 2024 offers a wide range of ergonomic customization options, powerful brakes, and a precise gearbox. Despite its high torque, the bike maintains accessible driving behavior. Additionally, it has a well-functioning and unobtrusively integrated emergency call system.

BMW R 1300 GS 2024

BMW R 1300 GS 2024

On the other hand, the Suzuki V-Strom 1000 2017 also has its own set of strengths. It has a powerful engine and good brakes with lean angle ABS. The bike features a Combined Brake System and traction control, ensuring safety during rides. The chassis is stable yet comfortable, making it suitable for touring. It also provides good wind protection and has a complete set of instruments, including a gear indicator. Additionally, the bike comes with a 12-volt socket in the cockpit area, hand protectors, and an engine guard as standard. The Suzuki V-Strom 1000 2017 offers all these features at a reasonable price.

However, both motorcycles also have their weaknesses. The BMW R 1300 GS 2024 does not offer every desired configuration option, sometimes requiring the selection of unnecessary extras. While the suspension works at a high level, it lacks flawless response behavior and a wide adjustment range. The Front Collision Warning (FCW) system can trigger annoying false alarms during rough everyday driving, and a very sporty riding style may result in a slight rolling motion in the vehicle. Additionally, the bike may appear too compact for tall riders, especially from the rear, and the ABS system provides too much feedback into the brake lever during sporty riding.

Suzuki V-Strom 1000 2017

Suzuki V-Strom 1000 2017

On the other hand, the Suzuki V-Strom 1000 2017 has a noticeable set-up torque when braking in curves, which can be a disadvantage for some riders.

In conclusion, both the BMW R 1300 GS 2024 and the Suzuki V-Strom 1000 2017 have their own unique strengths and weaknesses. The BMW R 1300 GS 2024 offers a powerful engine, excellent traction, and stable handling, while the Suzuki V-Strom 1000 2017 provides a powerful engine, good brakes, and a comfortable chassis. Ultimately, the choice between the two will depend on the rider's preferences and priorities.

Technical Specifications BMW R 1300 GS 2024 compared to Suzuki V-Strom 1000 2017

BMW R 1300 GS 2024
Suzuki V-Strom 1000 2017

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeBoxerEngine typeV
BoreBore106.5 mmBore100 mm
StrokeStroke73 mmStroke66 mm
Engine powerEngine power145 HPEngine power101 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power7,750 rpmRpm at Max. Power8,000 rpm
TorqueTorque149 NmTorque101 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque6,500 rpmRpm at Torque4,000 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio13.3 Compression Ratio11.3
Fuel systemFuel systemInjectionFuel systemInjection
StarterStarterElectricStarterElectric
Clutch TypeClutch TypeAntihoppingClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
TransmissionTransmissionProp shaftTransmissionChain
Transmission TypeTransmission TypeGearshiftTransmission TypeGearshift
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders2Cylinders2
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
Valves per cylinderValves per cylinder4Valves per cylinder4
ValvesValvesDOHCValvesDOHC
CoolingCoolingliquid-airCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement1,300 ccmDisplacement1,037 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionTeleleverFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork
TravelTravel190 mmTravel160 mm

Suspension Rear

SuspensionSuspensionParaleverSuspensionSwing arm
Shock absorberShock absorberMonoshockShock absorberMonoshock
TravelTravel200 mmTravel160 mm
AdjustmentAdjustmentPreloadAdjustmentPreload, Rebound
MaterialMaterialAluminiumMaterialAluminium

Chassis

FrameFrameSteelFrameAluminium
Frame typeFrame typeLoad-bearing engineFrame typeTwin Tube
RakeRake63.8 degreeRake64.5 degree
TrailTrail112 mmTrail109 mm

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeDouble disk
DiameterDiameter310 mmDiameter310 mm
PistonPistonFour pistonsPistonFour pistons
TechnologyTechnologyradialTechnologyradial, Monoblock

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
DiameterDiameter285 mmDiameter260 mm
PistonPistonDouble pistonPistonSingle piston

Assistance Systems

Advanced Rider Assistance SystemsAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABS, Anti-slipping control, Hill start assist, Riding modes, Combined Brake System, Cornering ABS, Ride by Wire, Cruise control, Traction controlAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsTraction control

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width110 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height80 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter19 inchFront tyre diameter19 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width170 mmRear tyre width150 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height60 %Rear tyre height70 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,212 mmLength2,280 mm
WidthWidth1,000 mmWidth930 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,518 mmWheelbase1,555 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height850 mmSeat Height850 mm
Kerb Weight (with ABS)Kerb Weight (with ABS)237 kgKerb Weight (with ABS)232 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity19 lFuel Tank Capacity20 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

BMW R 1300 GS 2024

BMW R 1300 GS 2024

BMW has developed the new R 1300 GS drawing on a wealth of experience and expertise, which is evident in its advanced technology and versatility. The model appeals to both experienced and new riders, offering an impressive combination of power, comfort and state-of-the-art features. It is a successful blend of compactness, power and luxury that performs equally well both off-road and on the road.

Powerful engine with very sporty responsiveness

Excellent traction

Very stable riding performance – yet the bike remains agile and a joy to ride through bends

Hand guards provide good wind protection

With minimal features, the bike looks more compact and sportier than before

Well-integrated radar cruise control

Intuitive control layout

Easy-to-read display

A wide range of options for ergonomics adjustment

A superbly functioning and discreetly integrated emergency call system

Excellent balance under varying load conditions

Not every desired configuration is possible – in some cases, you have to select unnecessary extras as well

The suspension performs well – but it doesn’t offer truly flawless responsiveness, nor does it have a particularly wide range of adjustment

Front Collision Warning (FCW) triggers annoying false alarms in raw everyday conditions

For taller riders, the bike feels a little too compact for an adventure bike, particularly from the rear

The side panels are prone to scratches on rough off-road terrain and when worn with heavy-duty boots

Hand guards with integrated indicators are not suitable for off-road use

Suzuki V-Strom 1000 2017

Suzuki V-Strom 1000 2017

Even though Suzuki may not have put as much work into the development of the V-Strom as its competitors in touring enduros, the Suzuki can use this circumstance to its advantage. In a world with extensive electronics packages, it still looks very purist in the 2019 model year, with only the cornering ABS hinting at innovation. Many customers want a simple motorbike, and the V-Strom 1000 appeals to precisely this target group. Its lusty V2 exudes endless character and, thanks to years of testing, is a bulletproof companion. Combined with the potent chassis and relaxed seating position, the Suzuki V-Strom 1000 gives you a sporty touring enduro that stands up to the digitalisation of motorbikes in today's world.

V2 full of character

mature technology

stable handling

ABS curves

comfortable seating position

easy-to-read instruments

the perfect touring enduro for purists.

Technically not up to date

electronics package cannot keep up with the competition

Price Comparison Average Market Price BMW R 1300 GS vs Suzuki V-Strom 1000

There are a few key differences between a BMW R 1300 GS 2024 and a Suzuki V-Strom 1000 2017. In terms of price, the actual average price of a BMW R 1300 GS 2024 is about 152% higher. Compared to Suzuki V-Strom 1000 2017 there are less BMW R 1300 GS 2024 bikes available on the 1000PS.de Marketplace, specifically 4 compared to 10. It takes less time to sell a BMW R 1300 GS with 15 days compared to 105 days for a Suzuki V-Strom 1000. Since model year 2024 1000PS.de editors have written 11 reviews for the BMW R 1300 GS and 40 reviews for the Suzuki V-Strom 1000 since model year 2005. The first review for the BMW R 1300 GS was published on 9/28/2023 and now has more than 49,900 views. This compares to more than 6,300 views for the first review on Suzuki V-Strom 1000 published on 7/23/2002.

Price BMW R 1300 GS

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Suzuki V-Strom 1000

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons