Yamaha XSR900 2016 vs. Yamaha XJR 1300 2013

Yamaha XSR900 2016

Yamaha XSR900 2016

Yamaha XJR 1300 2013

Yamaha XJR 1300 2013

Loading...

Technical Specifications Yamaha XSR900 2016 compared to Yamaha XJR 1300 2013

Yamaha XSR900 2016
Yamaha XJR 1300 2013

Engine and Drive Train

BoreBore78 mmBore79 mm
StrokeStroke59.1 mmStroke63.8 mm
Engine powerEngine power115 HPEngine power98 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power10,000 rpmRpm at Max. Power8,000 rpm
TorqueTorque87.5 NmTorque108.4 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque8,500 rpmRpm at Torque6,000 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio11.5 Compression Ratio9.7
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears5
CylindersCylinders3Cylinders4
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
Valves per cylinderValves per cylinder4Valves per cylinder4
ValvesValvesDOHCValvesDOHC
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingAir
DisplacementDisplacement847 ccmDisplacement1,251 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionTelescopic fork

Chassis

Frame typeFrame typeTwin TubeFrame typeDouble cradle

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeDouble disk

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width180 mmRear tyre width180 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height55 %Rear tyre height55 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,075 mmLength2,175 mm
WidthWidth815 mmWidth765 mm
HeightHeight1,135 mmHeight1,115 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,440 mmWheelbase1,500 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height815 mmSeat Height795 mm
Kerb WeightKerb Weight188 kgKerb Weight245 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity14 lFuel Tank Capacity21 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Yamaha XSR900 2016

Yamaha XSR900 2016

The XSR900 combines the performance of a sporty streetfighter with the look of a pleasing, cleanly finished retro naked bike. In doing so, the Japanese make use of their own history, which can be found bundled and without gaps in the archive of the design agency that has been working for Yamaha for 60 years. It adopts the virtues of the MT-09 and has mended some of its weaknesses. It rides more harmoniously, more controlled and, if desired, more relaxed. Only the comfort, and thus the rider, suffers from the tight chassis on bad roads. You have to be a little bit sensitive when it comes to a neo-classic.

Greedy engine

well-tuned riding modes

ABS and TC as standard

authentic modern design

clean workmanship

hard chassis

seat should be more comfortable

speedblock design already on many other models

Yamaha XJR 1300 2013

Yamaha XJR 1300 2013

For frequent pillion rides and relaxed long-distance journeys beyond the 180 km/h limit, the potent Yamaha with its combination of sovereign, smooth engine and long-distance seating is highly recommended.

Visually and functionally coherent

comfortable chassis

soft seat

superior braking system.

"Under-designed" components of the injection system.

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Yamaha XSR900 vs Yamaha XJR 1300

Price Yamaha XSR900

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Yamaha XJR 1300

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons