BMW S 1000 XR 2016 vs. BMW R 1250 RS 2019

BMW S 1000 XR 2016

BMW S 1000 XR 2016

BMW R 1250 RS 2019

BMW R 1250 RS 2019

Loading...

Overview - BMW S 1000 XR 2016 vs BMW R 1250 RS 2019

The BMW S 1000 XR 2016 and the BMW R 1250 RS 2019 are both sport touring motorcycles from BMW, but they have some notable differences in their technical specifications and strengths.

Starting with the engine and drive train, the BMW S 1000 XR 2016 is equipped with an in-line, 4-cylinder engine that produces 160 horsepower and 112 Nm of torque. It has a 4-stroke engine type and a displacement of 999cc. The transmission is a chain drive. On the other hand, the BMW R 1250 RS 2019 features a boxer engine with 2 cylinders, producing 136 horsepower and 143 Nm of torque. It also has a 4-stroke engine type, but with a larger displacement of 1254cc. The transmission is a prop shaft drive.

In terms of suspension, the BMW S 1000 XR 2016 has a telescopic fork front suspension and a swing arm rear suspension. The suspension can be adjusted for compression and rebound. The chassis is made of aluminum and has a twin tube frame type. The front brakes are double disk with radial technology. The advanced rider assistance systems include ABS and traction control.

BMW S 1000 XR 2016

BMW S 1000 XR 2016

On the other hand, the BMW R 1250 RS 2019 has an upside-down telescopic fork front suspension and a single swing arm rear suspension. The suspension can be adjusted for preload and rebound. The chassis is made of steel and has a load-bearing engine frame type. The front brakes are also double disk with radial technology. The advanced rider assistance systems include ABS, anti-slipping control, riding modes, and ride by wire.

In terms of dimensions and weights, both motorcycles have a front tire width of 120mm and a front tire diameter of 17 inches. However, the BMW S 1000 XR 2016 has a rear tire width of 190mm, while the BMW R 1250 RS 2019 has a rear tire width of 180mm. Both motorcycles have a rear tire diameter of 17 inches. The wheelbase of the BMW S 1000 XR 2016 is slightly longer at 1548mm compared to the 1530mm of the BMW R 1250 RS 2019. The seat height of the BMW S 1000 XR 2016 is higher at 840mm, while the BMW R 1250 RS 2019 has a seat height of 820mm. The kerb weight of the BMW S 1000 XR 2016 is 228kg, while the BMW R 1250 RS 2019 is slightly heavier at 243kg. Both motorcycles have a fuel tank capacity of 20 liters and 18 liters respectively.

BMW R 1250 RS 2019

BMW R 1250 RS 2019

In terms of strengths, the BMW S 1000 XR 2016 is praised for its sharp engine and design, high-quality workmanship, stable road holding, and comfortable seat. It also has successful ergonomics that cater to tall riders. On the other hand, the BMW R 1250 RS 2019 is praised for its precise and stable handling, agile high-revving boxer engine, modern look, and seating position suitable for touring. It also comes with ABS and traction control as standard, as well as selectable riding modes, a color TFT display, LED headlights, and an extensive accessories list.

However, both motorcycles have their weaknesses. The BMW S 1000 XR 2016 is noted for slight vibrations from the engine and could have better wind protection. The BMW R 1250 RS 2019, on the other hand, could benefit from a higher windshield and many of its features come at an extra cost.

In conclusion, the BMW S 1000 XR 2016 and the BMW R 1250 RS 2019 are both sport touring motorcycles with their own unique strengths and weaknesses. The BMW S 1000 XR 2016 offers a sharp engine and design, while the BMW R 1250 RS 2019 provides precise handling and a modern look. Ultimately, the choice between the two will depend on the rider's preferences and priorities.

Technical Specifications BMW S 1000 XR 2016 compared to BMW R 1250 RS 2019

BMW S 1000 XR 2016
BMW R 1250 RS 2019

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeBoxer
BoreBore80 mmBore102.5 mm
StrokeStroke49.7 mmStroke76 mm
Engine powerEngine power160 HPEngine power136 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power11,000 rpmRpm at Max. Power7,750 rpm
TorqueTorque112 NmTorque143 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque9,250 rpmRpm at Torque6,250 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio12 Compression Ratio12.5
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath, AntihoppingClutch TypeAntihopping
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionProp shaft
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders4Cylinders2
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
DisplacementDisplacement999 ccmDisplacement1,254 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionTelescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork

Suspension Rear

SuspensionSuspensionSwing armSuspensionSingle swing arm
AdjustmentAdjustmentCompression, ReboundAdjustmentPreload, Rebound

Chassis

FrameFrameAluminiumFrameSteel
Frame typeFrame typeTwin TubeFrame typeLoad-bearing engine

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeDouble disk
PistonPistonFour pistonsPistonFour pistons
TechnologyTechnologyradialTechnologyradial

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
PistonPistonSingle pistonPistonDouble piston
Shock mountShock mountFloating caliperShock mountFloating caliper

Assistance Systems

Advanced Rider Assistance SystemsAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABS, Traction controlAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABS, Anti-slipping control, Riding modes, Ride by Wire

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width190 mmRear tyre width180 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height55 %Rear tyre height55 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,183 mmLength2,202 mm
WidthWidth940 mmWidth925 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,548 mmWheelbase1,530 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height840 mmSeat Height820 mm
Kerb Weight (with ABS)Kerb Weight (with ABS)228 kgKerb Weight (with ABS)243 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity20 lFuel Tank Capacity18 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

BMW S 1000 XR 2016

BMW S 1000 XR 2016

The BMW S 1000 XR is a superbly crafted performance motorbike with a proud pedigree that shines with impeccable touring characteristics and solid touring capability. A wide range of accessories either trim the bike even more in the direction of sport or equip it for the great journey. With ABS and ASC as standard, you're always on the safe side and always relaxed thanks to the pleasant ergonomics. Just don't misunderstand the XR as an enduro for on/off-road, but see it as the evolution of a sport tourer.

Sharp engine

sharp design

high-quality workmanship

stable road holding

ABS and ASC standard

comfortable seat

successful ergonomics even for tall riders.

slight vibrations from the engine

wind protection could be better

BMW R 1250 RS 2019

BMW R 1250 RS 2019

Visually, the new BMW R 1250 RS is the only one of the five big boxers that has really undergone major changes. This is very fitting, because the new ShiftCam engine with its wonderful sovereignty from the rev range has changed the character, and the RS is now an even better tourer. It is still not a light, compact motorbike, but it offers wonderful stability and comfort, only the wind protection could be a little better. But sportiness is not neglected either, the enormously powerful boxer engine is extremely agile. As usual, the Bavarians are excellent at offering an attractive list of accessories, from which some features play a decisive role in the good performance: The ESA suspension should not be missing for frequently changing load conditions (passenger, luggage), and for the ultimate driving pleasure, the shift assistant Pro is a must.

Precise and stable handling

agile, high-revving boxer engine

modern look

seating position suitable for touring

ABS and traction control standard

selectable riding modes

colour TFT display and LED headlights standard

extensive accessories list

Windshield could be higher

many features at extra cost

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price BMW S 1000 XR vs BMW R 1250 RS

There are a few key differences between a BMW S 1000 XR 2016 and a BMW R 1250 RS 2019. In terms of price, the actual average price of a BMW R 1250 RS 2019 is about 24% higher. A BMW S 1000 XR 2016 experiences a loss of 970 USD in one year of ownership. This is offset by a loss of 260 USD for a BMW R 1250 RS 2019. Compared to BMW R 1250 RS 2019 there are more BMW S 1000 XR 2016 bikes available on the 1000PS.de Marketplace, specifically 19 compared to 6. It takes less time to sell a BMW R 1250 RS with 76 days compared to 89 days for the BMW S 1000 XR. Since model year 2015 1000PS.de editors have written 40 reviews for the BMW S 1000 XR and 11 reviews for the BMW R 1250 RS since model year 2019. The first review for the BMW S 1000 XR was published on 10/21/2014 and now has more than 16,000 views. This compares to more than 77,400 views for the first review on BMW R 1250 RS published on 11/6/2018.

Price BMW S 1000 XR

Model year
Current average market prices

Price BMW R 1250 RS

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH