Triumph Tiger 1050 2007 vs. Yamaha FZ-8N 2011

Triumph Tiger 1050 2007

Triumph Tiger 1050 2007

Yamaha FZ-8N 2011

Yamaha FZ-8N 2011

Loading...

Technical Specifications Triumph Tiger 1050 2007 compared to Yamaha FZ-8N 2011

Triumph Tiger 1050 2007
Yamaha FZ-8N 2011

Engine and Drive Train

Engine powerEngine power115 HPEngine power106 HP
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
CylindersCylinders3Cylinders4
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement1,050 ccmDisplacement779 ccm

Dimensions and Weights

WheelbaseWheelbase1,510 mmWheelbase1,460 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height835 mmSeat Height815 mm
Dry WeightDry Weight198 kgDry Weight197 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity20 lFuel Tank Capacity17 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Triumph Tiger 1050 2007

Triumph Tiger 1050 2007

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.

Yamaha FZ-8N 2011

Yamaha FZ-8N 2011

But as in life, you can't demonise the "approximate 3/4 litre" concept of the FZ-8 by quickly leafing through the data sheets. That would be a shame, because the 8 has given us a lot of pleasure in the 3,200 kilometres we have covered so far. Contrary to the facts, the 800 is probably the best choice for the average ambitious rider.

Stable and stable

chassis relatively universal

large variety of accessories

acceptable performance

Footrest detent insert sets too early and brings unsteadiness into the chassis - as well as scraping on the ground

ugly exhaust

a bit cumbersome

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Triumph Tiger 1050 vs Yamaha FZ-8N

Price Triumph Tiger 1050

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Yamaha FZ-8N

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH