Chigeecalimoto GmbHContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AG

Triumph Tiger 1050 2009 vs. Yamaha FZ-8N 2011

Triumph Tiger 1050 2009

Triumph Tiger 1050 2009

Yamaha FZ-8N 2011

Yamaha FZ-8N 2011

Loading...

Overview - Triumph Tiger 1050 2009 vs Yamaha FZ-8N 2011

Triumph Tiger 1050 2009

Triumph Tiger 1050 2009

Yamaha FZ-8N 2011

Yamaha FZ-8N 2011

Technical Specifications Triumph Tiger 1050 2009 compared to Yamaha FZ-8N 2011

Triumph Tiger 1050 2009
Yamaha FZ-8N 2011
Triumph Tiger 1050 2009
Triumph Tiger 1050 2009
Yamaha FZ-8N 2011
Yamaha FZ-8N 2011

Engine and Drive Train

BoreBore79 mmBore68 mm
StrokeStroke71.4 mmStroke53.6 mm
Engine powerEngine power116 HPEngine power106 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power9,400 rpmRpm at Max. Power10,000 rpm
TorqueTorque100 NmTorque82 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque6,250 rpmRpm at Torque8,000 rpm
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
CylindersCylinders3Cylinders4
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement1,050 ccmDisplacement779 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,110 mmLength2,140 mm
WidthWidth840 mmWidth770 mm
HeightHeight1,320 mmHeight1,065 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,510 mmWheelbase1,460 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height835 mmSeat Height815 mm
Dry WeightDry Weight198 kgDry Weight197 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity20 lFuel Tank Capacity17 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Triumph Tiger 1050 2009

Triumph Tiger 1050 2009

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.

Yamaha FZ-8N 2011

Yamaha FZ-8N 2011

But as in life, you can't demonise the "approximate 3/4 litre" concept of the FZ-8 by quickly leafing through the data sheets. That would be a shame, because the 8 has given us a lot of pleasure in the 3,200 kilometres we have covered so far. Contrary to the facts, the 800 is probably the best choice for the average ambitious rider.

Stable and stable

chassis relatively universal

large variety of accessories

acceptable performance

Footrest detent insert sets too early and brings unsteadiness into the chassis - as well as scraping on the ground

ugly exhaust

a bit cumbersome

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Triumph Tiger 1050 vs Yamaha FZ-8N

Price Triumph Tiger 1050

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Yamaha FZ-8N

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

Triumph Tiger Sport 2013
VS.
Triumph Tiger 1050 2012

Triumph Tiger Sport 2013 vs
Triumph Tiger 1050 2012

Yamaha FZ-8N 2014
VS.
Yamaha MT-09 2018

Yamaha FZ-8N 2014 vs
Yamaha MT-09 2018

Triumph Tiger 955i 2006
VS.
Triumph Tiger 1050 2007

Triumph Tiger 955i 2006 vs
Triumph Tiger 1050 2007

Yamaha FZ-8N 2014
VS.
Suzuki GSR 750 2014

Yamaha FZ-8N 2014 vs
Suzuki GSR 750 2014

Yamaha FZ6-N S2 2009
VS.
Yamaha FZ-8N 2012

Yamaha FZ6-N S2 2009 vs
Yamaha FZ-8N 2012

Yamaha FZ-8N 2014
VS.
Suzuki GSR 750 2016

Yamaha FZ-8N 2014 vs
Suzuki GSR 750 2016

Yamaha FZ-8N 2011
VS.
Kawasaki Z 750 2011

Yamaha FZ-8N 2011 vs
Kawasaki Z 750 2011

Triumph Tiger Sport 660 2022
VS.
Triumph Tiger 1050 2008

Triumph Tiger Sport 660 2022 vs
Triumph Tiger 1050 2008

Honda CB 600 F Hornet 2007
VS.
Yamaha FZ-8N 2012

Honda CB 600 F Hornet 2007 vs
Yamaha FZ-8N 2012

Triumph Tiger 1050 2007
VS.
Honda XL 1000 V Varadero 2013

Triumph Tiger 1050 2007 vs
Honda XL 1000 V Varadero 2013

Triumph Tiger 1050 2012
VS.
Triumph Tiger 800 XCA 2015

Triumph Tiger 1050 2012 vs
Triumph Tiger 800 XCA 2015

Yamaha FZ-8N 2016
VS.
Kawasaki Z 750 2013

Yamaha FZ-8N 2016 vs
Kawasaki Z 750 2013

Yamaha FZ6 Fazer 2008
VS.
Yamaha FZ-8N 2012

Yamaha FZ6 Fazer 2008 vs
Yamaha FZ-8N 2012

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH