BMW C 650 GT 2018 vs. Royal Enfield Continental GT 650 2021

BMW C 650 GT 2018

Royal Enfield Continental GT 650 2021
Loading...
Technical Specifications BMW C 650 GT 2018 compared to Royal Enfield Continental GT 650 2021
BMW C 650 GT 2018
Royal Enfield Continental GT 650 2021
Engine and Drive Train
| Engine type | Engine type | In line | Engine type | In line crankpin offset |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bore | Bore | 79 mm | Bore | 78 mm |
| Stroke | Stroke | 66 mm | Stroke | 67.8 mm |
| Engine power | Engine power | 60 HP | Engine power | 48 HP |
| Rpm at Max. Power | Rpm at Max. Power | 7,500 rpm | Rpm at Max. Power | 7,150 rpm |
| Torque | Torque | 63 Nm | Torque | 52 Nm |
| Rpm at Torque | Rpm at Torque | 6,000 rpm | Rpm at Torque | 5,150 rpm |
| Compression Ratio | Compression Ratio | 11.6 | Compression Ratio | 9.5 |
| Fuel system | Fuel system | Injection | Fuel system | Injection |
| Starter | Starter | Electric | Starter | Electric, Kick |
| Clutch Type | Clutch Type | Centrifugal force | Clutch Type | Multiplate in oil-bath |
| Transmission | Transmission | Chain | Transmission | Chain |
| Transmission Type | Transmission Type | Variomatic | Transmission Type | Gearshift |
| Cylinders | Cylinders | 2 | Cylinders | 2 |
| Strokes | Strokes | 4-Stroke | Strokes | 4-Stroke |
| Valves | Valves | DOHC | Valves | OHV |
| Cooling | Cooling | liquid | Cooling | Oil-air |
| Displacement | Displacement | 647 ccm | Displacement | 648 ccm |
Suspension Front
| Front suspension | Front suspension | Upside-Down telescopic fork | Front suspension | Telescopic fork |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Travel | Travel | 115 mm | Travel | 130 mm |
Suspension Rear
| Suspension | Suspension | Single swing arm | Suspension | Swing arm |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Travel | Travel | 115 mm | Travel | 120 mm |
Chassis
| Frame | Frame | Steel | Frame | Steel |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Frame type | Frame type | Tubular | Frame type | Load-bearing engine |
Brakes Front
| Type | Type | Double disk | Type | Single disk |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Diameter | Diameter | 270 mm | Diameter | 320 mm |
| Piston | Piston | Double piston | Piston | Double piston |
Brakes Rear
| Type | Type | Disc | Type | Disc |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Diameter | Diameter | 270 mm | Diameter | 240 mm |
| Piston | Piston | Double piston | Piston | Single piston |
Assistance Systems
| Advanced Rider Assistance Systems | Advanced Rider Assistance Systems | ABS, Anti-slipping control | Advanced Rider Assistance Systems | ABS |
|---|
Dimensions and Weights
| Front tyre width | Front tyre width | 120 mm | Front tyre width | 100 mm |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Front tyre height | Front tyre height | 70 % | Front tyre height | 90 % |
| Front tyre diameter | Front tyre diameter | 15 inch | Front tyre diameter | 18 inch |
| Rear tyre width | Rear tyre width | 160 mm | Rear tyre width | 130 mm |
| Rear tyre height | Rear tyre height | 60 % | Rear tyre height | 70 % |
| Rear tyre diameter | Rear tyre diameter | 15 inch | Rear tyre diameter | 18 inch |
| Length | Length | 2,235 mm | Length | 2,119 mm |
| Width | Width | 916 mm | Width | 745 mm |
| Wheelbase | Wheelbase | 1,591 mm | Wheelbase | 1,398 mm |
| Seat Height | Seat Height | 805 mm | Seat Height | 820 mm |
| Kerb Weight (with ABS) | Kerb Weight (with ABS) | 261 kg | Kerb Weight (with ABS) | 212 kg |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | Fuel Tank Capacity | 15.5 l | Fuel Tank Capacity | 12.5 l |
| License compliancy | License compliancy | A | License compliancy | A2 |
Price Comparison Avarage Market Price BMW C 650 GT vs Royal Enfield Continental GT 650
Price BMW C 650 GT
Model year
Current average market prices
Price Royal Enfield Continental GT 650
Model year
Current average market prices

















