Kawasaki Ninja ZX-6R 636 2013 vs. Suzuki GSX-R 1000 2009

Kawasaki Ninja ZX-6R 636 2013

Kawasaki Ninja ZX-6R 636 2013

Suzuki GSX-R 1000 2009

Suzuki GSX-R 1000 2009

Loading...

Overview - Kawasaki Ninja ZX-6R 636 2013 vs Suzuki GSX-R 1000 2009

The Kawasaki Ninja ZX-6R 636 2013 and the Suzuki GSX-R 1000 2009 are both high-performance supersport motorcycles. While they share some similarities in terms of engine type, bore, stroke, compression ratio, and displacement, they also have distinct differences in various aspects.

In terms of engine power, the Kawasaki Ninja ZX-6R 636 2013 produces 131 HP, while the Suzuki GSX-R 1000 2009 generates slightly more power at 136 HP. However, the torque output of the Kawasaki is 71 Nm, whereas the Suzuki offers a higher torque of 116.7 Nm. This indicates that the Suzuki may have better low-end power and acceleration compared to the Kawasaki.

Both motorcycles have a 4-cylinder engine configuration and utilize an in-line design. The Kawasaki has a displacement of 636 ccm, while the Suzuki has a slightly larger displacement of 999 ccm. This suggests that the Suzuki may have a more powerful and responsive engine overall.

Kawasaki Ninja ZX-6R 636 2013

Kawasaki Ninja ZX-6R 636 2013

In terms of suspension, both motorcycles offer adjustable compression, preload, and rebound settings for the front and rear suspension. This allows riders to fine-tune the suspension to their preferences and riding style.

Both motorcycles feature an aluminum frame, which provides a good balance between strength and weight. However, the Kawasaki utilizes a twin tube, perimeter, extruded frame type, while the Suzuki uses a twin-spar frame type. The choice of frame design can affect the overall handling and stability of the motorcycle.

In terms of braking, both motorcycles are equipped with double disk brakes at the front. The Kawasaki utilizes radial, monoblock, petal technology, while the Suzuki uses radial technology. Both braking systems are designed to provide excellent stopping power and control.

In terms of dimensions and weights, there are slight variations between the two motorcycles. The Kawasaki has a front tire width of 120 mm and a rear tire width of 180 mm, while the Suzuki has a slightly wider rear tire width of 190 mm. The wheelbase of the Kawasaki is 1395 mm, while the Suzuki has a slightly longer wheelbase of 1405 mm. The seat height of the Kawasaki is 830 mm, whereas the Suzuki has a slightly lower seat height of 810 mm. The kerb weight of the Kawasaki is 192 kg, while the Suzuki is slightly heavier at 203 kg. Both motorcycles have a fuel tank capacity of around 17 liters.

Suzuki GSX-R 1000 2009

Suzuki GSX-R 1000 2009

When it comes to strengths, the Kawasaki Ninja ZX-6R 636 2013 is praised for its sharpened geometry, good handling, and uncompromising reliability. On the other hand, the Suzuki GSX-R 1000 2009 is commended for its improved geometry, compact engine design, relaxed seating position, system with multiple height adjustments, and anti-hopping clutch.

In terms of weaknesses, the Kawasaki Ninja ZX-6R 636 2013 is criticized for its high purchase price. On the other hand, the Suzuki GSX-R 1000 2009 is noted for its suboptimal accessibility of compression adjustment, weakness in the lower rev range, and not being suitable for beginners.

Overall, both motorcycles offer impressive performance and features, but the Suzuki GSX-R 1000 2009 may have a slight edge in terms of power and low-end torque. However, the Kawasaki Ninja ZX-6R 636 2013 may provide better handling and reliability. Ultimately, the choice between the two would depend on the rider's preferences and priorities.

Technical Specifications Kawasaki Ninja ZX-6R 636 2013 compared to Suzuki GSX-R 1000 2009

Kawasaki Ninja ZX-6R 636 2013
Suzuki GSX-R 1000 2009

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeIn line
BoreBore67 mmBore74.5 mm
StrokeStroke45.1 mmStroke57.3 mm
Engine powerEngine power131 HPEngine power136 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power13,500 rpmRpm at Max. Power12,000 rpm
TorqueTorque71 NmTorque116.7 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque11,500 rpmRpm at Torque10,000 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio12.9 Compression Ratio12.8
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders4Cylinders4
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
DisplacementDisplacement636 ccmDisplacement999 ccm

Suspension Front

AdjustmentAdjustmentCompression, Preload, ReboundAdjustmentCompression, Preload, Rebound

Suspension Rear

AdjustmentAdjustmentCompression, Preload, ReboundAdjustmentCompression, Preload, Rebound

Chassis

FrameFrameAluminiumFrameAluminium
Frame typeFrame typeTwin Tube, Perimeter, ExtrudedFrame typeTwin-Spar

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeDouble disk
PistonPistonFour pistonsPistonFour pistons
TechnologyTechnologyradial, Monoblock, PetalTechnologyradial

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
PistonPistonSingle pistonPistonDouble piston

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width180 mmRear tyre width190 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height55 %Rear tyre height50 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,085 mmLength2,045 mm
WidthWidth705 mmWidth710 mm
HeightHeight1,115 mmHeight1,130 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,395 mmWheelbase1,405 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height830 mmSeat Height810 mm
Kerb WeightKerb Weight192 kgKerb Weight203 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity17 lFuel Tank Capacity17.5 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Kawasaki Ninja ZX-6R 636 2013

Kawasaki Ninja ZX-6R 636 2013

The Kawa convinces with its good handling and uncompromising reliability. A strong motorbike, but definitely not a bargain.

Sharpened geometry

seating position okay

good handling

uncompromising reliability.

High purchase price.

Suzuki GSX-R 1000 2009

Suzuki GSX-R 1000 2009

The GSX-R 1000 remains something for the experienced rider, despite its precise and balanced rideability and controllable power delivery. Suzuki knows that a thousand must remain a thousand and strictly adheres to this. Let's hope that they can continue to do so for a long time.

Improved geometry

compact engine design

relaxed seating position

system with multiple height adjustments

anti-hopping clutch.

Accessibility of compression adjustment suboptimal

weak in the lower rev range

not for beginners

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Kawasaki Ninja ZX-6R 636 vs Suzuki GSX-R 1000

There are a few key differences between a Kawasaki Ninja ZX-6R 636 2013 and a Suzuki GSX-R 1000 2009. It takes less time to sell a Suzuki GSX-R 1000 with 64 days compared to 122 days for the Kawasaki Ninja ZX-6R 636. Since model year 2013 1000PS.de editors have written 7 reviews for the Kawasaki Ninja ZX-6R 636 and 71 reviews for the Suzuki GSX-R 1000 since model year 2005. The first review for the Kawasaki Ninja ZX-6R 636 was published on 12/3/2012 and now has more than 20,800 views. This compares to more than 7,100 views for the first review on Suzuki GSX-R 1000 published on 3/3/2004.

Price Kawasaki Ninja ZX-6R 636

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Suzuki GSX-R 1000

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH