Honda FMX650 2005 vs. Husqvarna SM 630 2013

Honda FMX650 2005

Honda FMX650 2005

Husqvarna SM 630 2013

Husqvarna SM 630 2013

Loading...

Technical Specifications Honda FMX650 2005 compared to Husqvarna SM 630 2013

Honda FMX650 2005
Husqvarna SM 630 2013

Engine and Drive Train

TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
CylindersCylinders1Cylinders1
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
DisplacementDisplacement644 ccmDisplacement600 ccm

Dimensions and Weights

WheelbaseWheelbase1,490 mmWheelbase1,495 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height875 mmSeat Height910 mm
Dry WeightDry Weight163 kgDry Weight142.5 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity11 lFuel Tank Capacity12 l

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Honda FMX650 2005

Honda FMX650 2005

The bike is nimble in the city, uncomplicated to handle and very frugal in terms of service costs.

Uncomplicated driving pleasure

looks

nice torque curve

beginner-friendly

high-quality chassis

good brake system

easy handling.

Not too high performance

inadvisable for somewhat longer tours.

Husqvarna SM 630 2013

Husqvarna SM 630 2013

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Honda FMX650 vs Husqvarna SM 630

Price Honda FMX650

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Husqvarna SM 630

Unfortunately, the data available to us is not sufficient to provide meaningful price information for this model.

Alternative Comparisons