Magazine
Brands
Top Awards
Compare
About us
Home
TM EN 300 2013 vs. Husqvarna WR 300 2013
TM EN 300 2013
Husqvarna WR 300 2013
Loading...
Overview - TM EN 300 2013 vs Husqvarna WR 300 2013
TM EN 300 2013
Husqvarna WR 300 2013
Technical Specifications TM EN 300 2013 compared to Husqvarna WR 300 2013
TM EN 300 2013
Husqvarna WR 300 2013
Show all
Same only
Differences
TM EN 300 2013
Husqvarna WR 300 2013
Engine and Drive Train
Bore
Bore
72 mm
Bore
72 mm
Stroke
Stroke
72 mm
Stroke
72 mm
Starter
Starter
Kick
Starter
Kick
Transmission
Transmission
Chain
Transmission
Chain
Strokes
Strokes
2-Stroke
Strokes
2-Stroke
Displacement
Displacement
294 ccm
Displacement
293 ccm
Suspension Front
Brand
Brand
Marzocchi
Brand
Kayaba
Suspension Rear
Brand
Brand
Marzocchi
Brand
Kayaba
Brakes Front
Technology
Technology
Wave
Technology
Wave
Brakes Rear
Type
Type
Disc
Type
Disc
Dimensions and Weights
Front tyre width
Front tyre width
90 mm
Front tyre width
90 mm
Front tyre height
Front tyre height
90 %
Front tyre height
90 %
Front tyre diameter
Front tyre diameter
21 inch
Front tyre diameter
21 inch
Rear tyre width
Rear tyre width
140 mm
Rear tyre width
140 mm
Rear tyre height
Rear tyre height
80 %
Rear tyre height
80 %
Rear tyre diameter
Rear tyre diameter
18 inch
Rear tyre diameter
18 inch
Fuel Tank Capacity
Fuel Tank Capacity
8.2 l
Fuel Tank Capacity
9.5 l
Alternative Comparisons
VS.
TM EN 300 2013 vs
KTM 300 EXC TPI Sixdays 2018
VS.
KTM 300 EXC TPI Sixdays 2022 vs
TM EN 300 2013
VS.
Husqvarna WRE 125 2010 vs
Husqvarna WR 300 2010
VS.
Husqvarna WR 250 2005 vs
Husqvarna WR 300 2009
VS.
Husqvarna 701 Supermoto 2022 vs
Husqvarna WR 300 2009
VS.
Husqvarna WR 300 2009 vs
Husqvarna TE 300 2014
VS.
Yamaha R1 2022 vs
Husqvarna WR 300 2009
VS.
TM EN 300 2013 vs
KTM 350 EXC-F 2013
VS.
Husqvarna TE 450 2010 vs
Husqvarna WR 300 2009
VS.
Husqvarna WRE 125 2011 vs
Husqvarna WR 300 2010
VS.
Husqvarna WRE 125 2009 vs
Husqvarna WR 300 2009
VS.
Husqvarna WR 300 2011 vs
Husqvarna TE 300i 2019
VS.
Husqvarna TE 300i 2022 vs
TM EN 300 2013