Kawasaki ER-6n 2008 vs. Suzuki GSX-R 600 2009

Kawasaki ER-6n 2008

Kawasaki ER-6n 2008

Suzuki GSX-R 600 2009

Suzuki GSX-R 600 2009

Loading...

Overview - Kawasaki ER-6n 2008 vs Suzuki GSX-R 600 2009

Kawasaki ER-6n 2008

Kawasaki ER-6n 2008

Suzuki GSX-R 600 2009

Suzuki GSX-R 600 2009

Technical Specifications Kawasaki ER-6n 2008 compared to Suzuki GSX-R 600 2009

Kawasaki ER-6n 2008
Suzuki GSX-R 600 2009

Engine and Drive Train

Engine powerEngine power72 HPEngine power92 HP
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
CylindersCylinders2Cylinders4
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
DisplacementDisplacement649 ccmDisplacement599 ccm

Dimensions and Weights

WheelbaseWheelbase1,405 mmWheelbase1,400 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height785 mmSeat Height810 mm
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity15.5 lFuel Tank Capacity17 l
Top SpeedTop Speed200 km/hTop Speed260 km/h
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Kawasaki ER-6n 2008

Kawasaki ER-6n 2008

Kawasaki doesn't build toys. The ER-6N is getting more serious - and remains beginner-friendly.

Lightness

precision

rideability

modern, dynamic look

beginner-friendly

trustworthy ergonomics

ABS.

Sitting position with regard to the footrests uncomfortable from 1.80m

hardly suitable for wheelies

Suzuki GSX-R 600 2009

Suzuki GSX-R 600 2009

The new bike is definitely not just a model update, but a noticeably better overall concept, even for hobby riders, which is more enjoyable than any previous 600.

Relatively low overall weight

easy handling

good-sounding power unit

precise braking system

quiet, stable chassis.

Somewhat suboptimal in the high rev range

inappropriate design.

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Kawasaki ER-6n vs Suzuki GSX-R 600

Price Kawasaki ER-6n

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Suzuki GSX-R 600

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH