BMW S 1000 R 2022 vs. Kawasaki Z1000 2014

BMW S 1000 R 2022

BMW S 1000 R 2022

Kawasaki Z1000 2014

Kawasaki Z1000 2014

Loading...

Overview - BMW S 1000 R 2022 vs Kawasaki Z1000 2014

The BMW S 1000 R 2022 and the Kawasaki Z1000 2014 are both naked bikes with similar engine types, inline four-cylinder engines. However, there are several notable differences between the two models.

In terms of engine power, the BMW S 1000 R 2022 has a clear advantage with 165 HP compared to the Kawasaki Z1000 2014's 142 HP. This translates to a more powerful and exhilarating riding experience on the BMW.

When it comes to torque, the BMW S 1000 R 2022 also comes out on top with 114 Nm compared to the Kawasaki Z1000 2014's 111 Nm. This means that the BMW will have better acceleration and pulling power.

Both motorcycles have liquid cooling systems, which help to maintain optimal engine temperatures even during long rides or in hot weather conditions. This ensures that the engines perform at their best and minimizes the risk of overheating.

In terms of suspension, both bikes feature upside-down telescopic forks at the front and offer adjustments for compression, preload, and rebound. This allows riders to fine-tune the suspension settings according to their preferences and riding style.

BMW S 1000 R 2022

BMW S 1000 R 2022

The chassis of both motorcycles is made of aluminum, which provides a good balance between strength and weight. However, the BMW S 1000 R 2022 has a twin-tube frame, while the Kawasaki Z1000 2014 has a double cradle frame. The choice of frame design can affect the overall handling and stability of the bike.

When it comes to braking performance, both motorcycles feature double disc brakes at the front with four pistons. The BMW S 1000 R 2022 has radial technology, which enhances braking efficiency and provides better control. The Kawasaki Z1000 2014 also has radial technology, as well as petal discs, which help to dissipate heat more effectively.

In terms of tire dimensions, both bikes have the same front and rear tire widths of 120 mm and 190 mm, respectively. The tire diameters are also the same at 17 inches. These tire dimensions provide good stability and grip on the road.

The wheelbase of the BMW S 1000 R 2022 is slightly longer at 1450 mm compared to the Kawasaki Z1000 2014's 1435 mm. This may result in slightly better stability and handling on the BMW.

Kawasaki Z1000 2014

Kawasaki Z1000 2014

When it comes to seat height, the BMW S 1000 R 2022 has a higher seat height at 830 mm compared to the Kawasaki Z1000 2014's 815 mm. This may be a consideration for riders with shorter inseams.

In terms of fuel tank capacity, the BMW S 1000 R 2022 has a slightly larger tank at 16.5 liters compared to the Kawasaki Z1000 2014's 15 liters. This means that the BMW will have a slightly longer range before needing to refuel.

In terms of strengths, the BMW S 1000 R 2022 has a more powerful engine, strong brakes, comfortable ergonomics, good standard equipment, and an extensive range of accessories. On the other hand, the Kawasaki Z1000 2014 is praised for its sophisticated design, extremely pleasant handling, pleasant sound, and good brakes.

As for weaknesses, the BMW S 1000 R 2022 is criticized for having a sluggish shift assistant and optics that are not 100% coherent. The Kawasaki Z1000 2014's main weakness is its high purchase price compared to the S1000R.

Overall, both the BMW S 1000 R 2022 and the Kawasaki Z1000 2014 have their own strengths and weaknesses. The BMW offers a more powerful and technologically advanced riding experience, while the Kawasaki provides a stylish design and enjoyable handling. Ultimately, the choice between the two will depend on the rider's preferences and priorities.

Technical Specifications BMW S 1000 R 2022 compared to Kawasaki Z1000 2014

BMW S 1000 R 2022
Kawasaki Z1000 2014

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeIn line
BoreBore80 mmBore77 mm
StrokeStroke49.7 mmStroke56 mm
Engine powerEngine power165 HPEngine power142 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power11,000 rpmRpm at Max. Power10,000 rpm
TorqueTorque114 NmTorque111 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque9,250 rpmRpm at Torque7,300 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio12.5 Compression Ratio11.8
StarterStarterElectricStarterElectric
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath, AntihoppingClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders4Cylinders4
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement999 ccmDisplacement1,043 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork
AdjustmentAdjustmentCompression, Preload, ReboundAdjustmentCompression, Preload, Rebound

Suspension Rear

AdjustmentAdjustmentCompression, Preload, ReboundAdjustmentCompression, Preload, Rebound

Chassis

FrameFrameAluminiumFrameAluminium
Frame typeFrame typeTwin TubeFrame typeDouble cradle

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeDouble disk
PistonPistonFour pistonsPistonFour pistons
Shock mountShock mountFixed caliperShock mountSemi-Schwimmsattel
TechnologyTechnologyradialTechnologyradial, Petal

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
PistonPistonSingle pistonPistonSingle piston
Shock mountShock mountFloating caliperShock mountFixed caliper

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width190 mmRear tyre width190 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height55 %Rear tyre height50 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,090 mmLength2,045 mm
WidthWidth812 mmWidth790 mm
HeightHeight1,115 mmHeight1,055 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,450 mmWheelbase1,435 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height830 mmSeat Height815 mm
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity16.5 lFuel Tank Capacity15 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

BMW S 1000 R 2022

BMW S 1000 R 2022

The seating position is sporty, but by no means uncomfortable, the brakes are powerful and the engine of the S 1000 R is at its best - perhaps even a little too homogeneous. There is also nothing to complain about on the riding side. Based on the pure performance data and the installed electronic features, the BMW probably has what it takes for the fastest lap time. And that on any kind of surface, because with the semi-active suspension you can eat up kilometre after kilometre on bad roads littered with potholes. Unfortunately, this feeling of superiority never really spilled over to the driver. Probably the downside of too much balance in all areas - at least in my Italophile eyes. The BMW lacked that certain something, the charisma, which is difficult to explain but arouses genuine emotions.

powerful engine

strong brakes

comfortable ergonomics

good standard equipment

extensive range of accessories

Sluggish shift assistant

optics not 100% coherent

Kawasaki Z1000 2014

Kawasaki Z1000 2014

The Kawasaki Z1000 (2014) is a statement against the electronic trend of its time - and that is exactly what makes it special today. Its characterful four-cylinder engine, mechanical directness and uncompromising focus on the essentials strike a chord in a time when many bikes have become rolling computers. Yes, it does without modern Advanced Rider Assistance Systems and perfect wind protection. But it offers an authentic naked bike riding experience, paired with Japanese reliability and reasonable maintenance costs. The Z1000 is not a bike for data sheet junkies or electronics fans - it is a bike for people who still want to make their own decisions when rider. An honest bike with character that continues to inspire even after years and more than fulfils its role as an emotional alternative to the digital modern age.

Strong character 1043cc in-line four-cylinder

Outstanding running culture

Direct throttle response

Low maintenance costs

High reliability

Good availability of spare parts

High resale value

Balanced handling

Stable road holding

High-quality workmanship

Puristic driving concept

Authentic driving experience

Large fan community

Robust suitability for everyday use

Mechanical directness

Active owner community

No modern rider assistance systems

No quickshifter

In practice, the relatively small tank sometimes gets in the way

Hard seat

Vibrations at high revs

Relatively sluggish when changing direction quickly

Damper tuning relatively firm - Suspension performance not good enough for demanding riders

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price BMW S 1000 R vs Kawasaki Z1000

There are a few key differences between a BMW S 1000 R 2022 and a Kawasaki Z1000 2014. In terms of price, the actual average price of a BMW S 1000 R 2022 is about 89% higher. Compared to Kawasaki Z1000 2014 there are more BMW S 1000 R 2022 bikes available on the 1000PS.de Marketplace, specifically 22 compared to 12. It takes less time to sell a BMW S 1000 R with 71 days compared to 75 days for a Kawasaki Z1000. Since model year 2014 1000PS.de editors have written 62 reviews for the BMW S 1000 R and 41 reviews for the Kawasaki Z1000 since model year 2005. The first review for the BMW S 1000 R was published on 11/3/2013 and now has more than 17,300 views. This compares to more than 5,800 views for the first review on Kawasaki Z1000 published on 9/2/2002.

Price BMW S 1000 R

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Kawasaki Z1000

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH