BMW F 650 GS 2010 vs. Royal Enfield Himalayan 2017

BMW F 650 GS 2010

BMW F 650 GS 2010

Royal Enfield Himalayan 2017

Royal Enfield Himalayan 2017

Loading...

Overview - BMW F 650 GS 2010 vs Royal Enfield Himalayan 2017

BMW F 650 GS 2010

BMW F 650 GS 2010

Royal Enfield Himalayan 2017

Royal Enfield Himalayan 2017

Technical Specifications BMW F 650 GS 2010 compared to Royal Enfield Himalayan 2017

BMW F 650 GS 2010
Royal Enfield Himalayan 2017

Engine and Drive Train

BoreBore82 mmBore78 mm
StrokeStroke75.6 mmStroke86 mm
Engine powerEngine power71 HPEngine power24.5 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power7,000 rpmRpm at Max. Power6,500 rpm
TorqueTorque75 NmTorque32 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque4,500 rpmRpm at Torque4,000 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio12 Compression Ratio9.5
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears5
CylindersCylinders2Cylinders1
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
DisplacementDisplacement798 ccmDisplacement411 ccm

Suspension Rear

SuspensionSuspensionSwing armSuspensionSwing arm

Chassis

FrameFrameSteelFrameSteel
Frame typeFrame typeTubular, Load-bearing engineFrame typeDouble cradle

Brakes Front

PistonPistonDouble pistonPistonDouble piston

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
PistonPistonSingle pistonPistonSingle piston

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width100 mmFront tyre width90 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height80 %Front tyre height90 %
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width140 mmRear tyre width120 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height80 %Rear tyre height90 %
LengthLength2,280 mmLength2,190 mm
WidthWidth890 mmWidth840 mm
HeightHeight1,240 mmHeight1,360 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,575 mmWheelbase1,465 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height790 mmSeat Height800 mm
Kerb WeightKerb Weight199 kgKerb Weight182 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity16 lFuel Tank Capacity15 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA2

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

BMW F 650 GS 2010

BMW F 650 GS 2010

When it comes to optional extras, accessories and driver equipment, BMW is the benchmark for us. The driver can have his vehicle configured exactly to his wishes and also order the matching clothing at the same time.

Manoeuvrability

agility

low seat height can be reduced again

heated grips

comfortable seat

resale value.

Wind protection somewhat suboptimal compared to the F800.

Royal Enfield Himalayan 2017

Royal Enfield Himalayan 2017

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price BMW F 650 GS vs Royal Enfield Himalayan

Price BMW F 650 GS

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Royal Enfield Himalayan

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH