BMW R 1250 RS 2020 vs. BMW S 1000 R 2014

BMW R 1250 RS 2020

BMW S 1000 R 2014
Loading...
Overview - BMW R 1250 RS 2020 vs BMW S 1000 R 2014

BMW R 1250 RS 2020

BMW S 1000 R 2014
Technical Specifications BMW R 1250 RS 2020 compared to BMW S 1000 R 2014
BMW R 1250 RS 2020
BMW S 1000 R 2014
Engine and Drive Train
Engine type | Engine type | Boxer | Engine type | In line |
---|---|---|---|---|
Bore | Bore | 102.5 mm | Bore | 80 mm |
Stroke | Stroke | 76 mm | Stroke | 49.7 mm |
Engine power | Engine power | 136 HP | Engine power | 160 HP |
Rpm at Max. Power | Rpm at Max. Power | 7,750 rpm | Rpm at Max. Power | 11,000 rpm |
Torque | Torque | 143 Nm | Torque | 112 Nm |
Rpm at Torque | Rpm at Torque | 6,250 rpm | Rpm at Torque | 9,250 rpm |
Compression Ratio | Compression Ratio | 12.5 | Compression Ratio | 12 |
Clutch Type | Clutch Type | Antihopping | Clutch Type | Multiplate in oil-bath, Antihopping |
Transmission | Transmission | Prop shaft | Transmission | Chain |
Number of gears | Number of gears | 6 | Number of gears | 6 |
Cylinders | Cylinders | 2 | Cylinders | 4 |
Strokes | Strokes | 4-Stroke | Strokes | 4-Stroke |
Displacement | Displacement | 1,254 ccm | Displacement | 999 ccm |
Suspension Front
Front suspension | Front suspension | Upside-Down telescopic fork | Front suspension | Upside-Down telescopic fork |
---|
Suspension Rear
Suspension | Suspension | Single swing arm | Suspension | Swing arm |
---|---|---|---|---|
Shock absorber | Shock absorber | Monoshock | Shock absorber | Monoshock |
Chassis
Frame | Frame | Steel | Frame | Aluminium |
---|---|---|---|---|
Frame type | Frame type | Load-bearing engine | Frame type | Twin Tube |
Brakes Front
Type | Type | Double disk | Type | Double disk |
---|---|---|---|---|
Piston | Piston | Four pistons | Piston | Four pistons |
Technology | Technology | radial | Technology | radial |
Brakes Rear
Type | Type | Disc | Type | Disc |
---|---|---|---|---|
Piston | Piston | Double piston | Piston | Single piston |
Shock mount | Shock mount | Floating caliper | Shock mount | Floating caliper |
Assistance Systems
Advanced Rider Assistance Systems | Advanced Rider Assistance Systems | ABS, Anti-slipping control, Riding modes, Ride by Wire | Advanced Rider Assistance Systems | Dynamic suspension |
---|
Dimensions and Weights
Front tyre width | Front tyre width | 120 mm | Front tyre width | 120 mm |
---|---|---|---|---|
Front tyre height | Front tyre height | 70 % | Front tyre height | 70 % |
Front tyre diameter | Front tyre diameter | 17 inch | Front tyre diameter | 17 inch |
Rear tyre width | Rear tyre width | 180 mm | Rear tyre width | 190 mm |
Rear tyre height | Rear tyre height | 55 % | Rear tyre height | 55 % |
Rear tyre diameter | Rear tyre diameter | 17 inch | Rear tyre diameter | 17 inch |
Length | Length | 2,202 mm | Length | 2,057 mm |
Width | Width | 925 mm | Width | 845 mm |
Wheelbase | Wheelbase | 1,530 mm | Wheelbase | 1,439 mm |
Seat Height | Seat Height | 820 mm | Seat Height | 814 mm |
Kerb Weight (with ABS) | Kerb Weight (with ABS) | 243 kg | Kerb Weight (with ABS) | 207 kg |
Fuel Tank Capacity | Fuel Tank Capacity | 18 l | Fuel Tank Capacity | 17.5 l |
License compliancy | License compliancy | A | License compliancy | A |
Pros and Cons in comparison
Pros and Cons in comparison
BMW R 1250 RS 2020

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.
BMW S 1000 R 2014

Brutal power, smooth, almost perfect, electronics, it only gets better with the HP4. Now BMW dominates the 1000cc naked bike class after the superbikes.
Sporty chassis
extreme power and performance
very good electronic helpers
terrific price/performance ratio
fast and comfortable on the racetrack and on country roads.
Slightly rough engine running
DDC works well, but still rather on the "hard" side overall
seat relatively high
tempts to overdrive
design a matter of taste.
Price Comparison Avarage Market Price BMW R 1250 RS vs BMW S 1000 R
Price BMW R 1250 RS
Model year
Current average market prices
Price BMW S 1000 R
Model year
Current average market prices