BMW S 1000 R 2015 vs. BMW S 1000 XR 2015

BMW S 1000 R 2015

BMW S 1000 R 2015

BMW S 1000 XR 2015

BMW S 1000 XR 2015

Loading...

Overview - BMW S 1000 R 2015 vs BMW S 1000 XR 2015

The BMW S 1000 R 2015 and the BMW S 1000 XR 2015 are both powerful motorcycles with similar technical specifications. They both have an in-line, 4-stroke engine with a displacement of 999cc and an engine power of 160 HP. The torque is also the same at 112 Nm. Both bikes have a chain transmission and 4 cylinders.

In terms of suspension, the BMW S 1000 R 2015 has an upside-down telescopic fork at the front and a swing arm suspension at the rear. On the other hand, the BMW S 1000 XR 2015 has a telescopic fork at the front and a swing arm suspension at the rear. Both bikes have an aluminum frame with a twin tube design.

BMW S 1000 R 2015

BMW S 1000 R 2015

The braking system on both bikes is also similar, with double disk brakes at the front and four pistons. The technology used is radial. The BMW S 1000 XR 2015 also has ABS and traction control as standard, providing advanced rider assistance systems.

In terms of dimensions and weights, the front and rear tire widths and diameters are the same for both bikes, with a width of 120mm and a diameter of 17 inches. However, the wheelbase and seat height differ. The BMW S 1000 R 2015 has a wheelbase of 1439mm and a seat height of 814mm, while the BMW S 1000 XR 2015 has a wheelbase of 1548mm and a seat height of 840mm. The kerb weight of the BMW S 1000 R 2015 is 207kg with ABS, while the BMW S 1000 XR 2015 is slightly heavier at 228kg with ABS. The fuel tank capacity of the BMW S 1000 R 2015 is 17.5 liters, while the BMW S 1000 XR 2015 has a larger capacity of 20 liters.

In terms of strengths, the BMW S 1000 R 2015 is praised for its powerful and well-controllable engine, powerful braking system, and comparatively comfortable seating position. On the other hand, the BMW S 1000 XR 2015 is praised for its sharp engine, cool design, high-quality workmanship, stable road holding, ABS and ASC standard, comfortable seat, and successful ergonomics even for tall riders.

BMW S 1000 XR 2015

BMW S 1000 XR 2015

However, both bikes have their weaknesses. The BMW S 1000 R 2015 has expensive optional extras that may be irresistible but costly. It also has a hard chassis and vibrations in the handlebars. The BMW S 1000 XR 2015 experiences vibrations in the mid rev range, and the wind protection could be better. Additionally, some riders find the exhaust sound to be screeching.

In conclusion, both the BMW S 1000 R 2015 and the BMW S 1000 XR 2015 are powerful motorcycles with similar technical specifications. They have their strengths and weaknesses, with the BMW S 1000 R 2015 offering a more comfortable seating position and the BMW S 1000 XR 2015 providing ABS and traction control as standard. Riders should consider their preferences and priorities when choosing between the two models.

Technical Specifications BMW S 1000 R 2015 compared to BMW S 1000 XR 2015

BMW S 1000 R 2015
BMW S 1000 XR 2015

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeIn line
BoreBore80 mmBore80 mm
StrokeStroke49.7 mmStroke49.7 mm
Engine powerEngine power160 HPEngine power160 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power11,000 rpmRpm at Max. Power11,000 rpm
TorqueTorque112 NmTorque112 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque9,250 rpmRpm at Torque9,250 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio12 Compression Ratio12
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath, AntihoppingClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath, Antihopping
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders4Cylinders4
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
DisplacementDisplacement999 ccmDisplacement999 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionTelescopic fork

Suspension Rear

SuspensionSuspensionSwing armSuspensionSwing arm

Chassis

FrameFrameAluminiumFrameAluminium
Frame typeFrame typeTwin TubeFrame typeTwin Tube

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeDouble disk
PistonPistonFour pistonsPistonFour pistons
TechnologyTechnologyradialTechnologyradial

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
PistonPistonSingle pistonPistonSingle piston
Shock mountShock mountFloating caliperShock mountFloating caliper

Assistance Systems

Advanced Rider Assistance SystemsAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsDynamic suspensionAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABS, Traction control

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width190 mmRear tyre width190 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height55 %Rear tyre height55 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,057 mmLength2,183 mm
WidthWidth845 mmWidth940 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,439 mmWheelbase1,548 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height814 mmSeat Height840 mm
Kerb Weight (with ABS)Kerb Weight (with ABS)207 kgKerb Weight (with ABS)228 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity17.5 lFuel Tank Capacity20 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

BMW S 1000 R 2015

BMW S 1000 R 2015

The BMW S 1000 R impresses across the board and is much more than just a naked version of the S 1000 RR. With its own character, more torque in the mid-range and first-class electronics, it sets new standards in the high-performance Naked segment. The overall package of brutal performance, excellent suspension and practical everyday use makes it one of the best naked bikes ever - and at a surprisingly fair price.

Brutal performance with 160 Horsepower

Outstanding DDC suspension

Amazing stability at high speeds for a naked bike

Perfect electronics with sensitive DTC

Good price/performance ratio

Character despite perfection

Driving mode display font too small

Too extreme appearance for BMW traditionalists

Without equipment packages, important electronic features are missing

The price advantage is lost with full features

BMW S 1000 XR 2015

BMW S 1000 XR 2015

The S 1000 XR, with its now 165 hp Supersport power unit combined with the geometry and comfort of a Bigenduro, is one of the fastest motorbikes on the public road. The extensive range of accessories makes it even faster or even more comfortable, as required. However, with a seat height of 840 mm and a long crotch arch, it is only conditionally suitable for smaller riders. The 790 mm high seat, however, remedies this. The brakes are as strong as the engine, the XR convinces with precision and above all stability. Despite the insane performance, you feel well and safe, as you would expect from a BMW.

Power increase

strong brakes and engine

decent standard equipment

extensive accessories

numerous HP Parts available

precise and stable handling.

somewhat wide in the leg area due to 4-cylinder

very wide handlebars

low seat necessary for smaller riders

Price Comparison Average Market Price BMW S 1000 R vs BMW S 1000 XR

There are a few key differences between a BMW S 1000 R 2015 and a BMW S 1000 XR 2015. In terms of price, the actual average price of a BMW S 1000 XR 2015 is about 20% higher. A BMW S 1000 R 2015 experiences a loss of 250 USD in one year and 600 USD in two years of ownership. This is offset by a loss of 1,150 USD and 1,560 USD for a BMW S 1000 XR 2015. Compared to BMW S 1000 XR 2015 there are less BMW S 1000 R 2015 bikes available on the 1000PS.de Marketplace, specifically 12 compared to 16. It takes less time to sell a BMW S 1000 R with 61 days compared to 93 days for a BMW S 1000 XR. Since model year 2014 1000PS.de editors have written 62 reviews for the BMW S 1000 R and 40 reviews for the BMW S 1000 XR since model year 2015. The first review for the BMW S 1000 R was published on 11/3/2013 and now has more than 17,300 views. This compares to more than 16,000 views for the first review on BMW S 1000 XR published on 10/21/2014.

Price BMW S 1000 R

Model year
Current average market prices

Price BMW S 1000 XR

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons