Yamaha MT-10 SP 2023 vs. Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2023

In terms of technical specifications, the Yamaha MT-10 SP 2023 and the Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2023 have some similarities and differences. Both bikes have an inline engine type, fuel injection system, liquid cooling, and a swing arm suspension. However, the Yamaha MT-10 SP has a larger engine displacement of 998cc compared to the Triumph Street Triple's 765cc engine. The Yamaha also has more power with 166 HP compared to the Triumph's 130 HP. Additionally, the Yamaha has a higher torque of 112 Nm compared to the Triumph's 80 Nm.

In terms of suspension, the Yamaha MT-10 SP features an upside-down telescopic fork from Kayaba in the front and an Öhlins monoshock in the rear. The Triumph Street Triple 765 RS also has an upside-down telescopic fork, but from Showa, and an Öhlins monoshock in the rear. Both bikes offer adjustable compression, preload, and rebound settings for the suspension.

When it comes to the chassis, both bikes have an aluminum frame. However, the Yamaha MT-10 SP has a Deltabox frame type, while the Triumph Street Triple 765 RS has a Twin Tube frame type.

Yamaha MT-10 SP 2023

In terms of braking, both bikes have double disk brakes in the front with four pistons. The Yamaha MT-10 SP has 320mm diameter disks, while the Triumph Street Triple 765 RS has slightly smaller 310mm diameter disks. Both bikes use Brembo brakes, but the Triumph's brakes are monoblock technology.

In terms of advanced rider assistance systems, the Yamaha MT-10 SP offers a wide range of features including ABS, electronically adjustable suspension, riding modes, cornering ABS, ride by wire, shift assistant with blipper, cruise control, traction control, and anti-wheelie. The Triumph Street Triple 765 RS offers riding modes, cornering ABS, ride by wire, shift assistant with blipper, and traction control.

In terms of dimensions and weights, the Yamaha MT-10 SP has a front tire width of 120mm and a rear tire width of 190mm, both with a 17-inch diameter. The bike has a wheelbase of 1405mm and a seat height of 835mm. The kerb weight with ABS is 214kg, and it has a fuel tank capacity of 17 liters. The range is approximately 248km, and the combined fuel consumption is 6.83 l/100km. The Triumph Street Triple 765 RS has a front tire width of 120mm and a rear tire width of 180mm, both with a 17-inch diameter. It has a slightly shorter wheelbase of 1399mm and a seat height of 836mm. The kerb weight with ABS is 188kg, and it has a fuel tank capacity of 15 liters. The range is approximately 277km, and the combined fuel consumption is 5.4 l/100km.

In terms of equipment, both bikes offer LED headlights and a TFT display. The Yamaha MT-10 SP also features LED daytime running lights, while the Triumph Street Triple 765 RS offers connectivity in addition to its other equipment.

Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2023

Now, let's discuss the strengths and weaknesses of each bike. The Yamaha MT-10 SP is praised for its great ride comfort, balance between sportiness and practicality, fantastic engine response, sensitive and practical chassis, high-quality frame including a magnificent swingarm, wonderfully relaxed seating position, cool sound, and overall being a true naked bike. On the other hand, some weaknesses mentioned include the bike feeling too comfortable on a racetrack excursion due to its inactive and comfortable seating position, a slightly lumpy front appearance, and brakes that are good but may seem undersized for a top model.

The Triumph Street Triple 765 RS is praised for its engine performance, chassis, brakes, complete electronic equipment, build quality, and price. However, one weakness mentioned is that the speed is difficult to read due to it being too subtle on the display.

In conclusion, both the Yamaha MT-10 SP 2023 and the Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2023 have their own strengths and weaknesses. The Yamaha offers a more powerful engine and a wider range of advanced rider assistance systems, while the Triumph offers a slightly lighter weight and a lower price. Ultimately, the choice between the two will depend on the rider's preferences and priorities.