BMW F 900 R 2020 vs. Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2020

BMW F 900 R 2020

Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2020
Overview - BMW F 900 R 2020 vs Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2020
When comparing the BMW F 900 R 2020 and the Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2020, it is important to consider their technical specifications and strengths and weaknesses.
Starting with the technical specifications, both bikes have an inline engine type, but the BMW F 900 R has a slightly lower engine power of 105 HP compared to the Triumph Street Triple 765 RS with 123 HP. The torque of the BMW F 900 R is higher at 92 Nm compared to 79 Nm for the Triumph Street Triple 765 RS. Both bikes have a liquid cooling system and fuel injection.
In terms of suspension, both bikes have upside-down telescopic forks in the front and a swing arm with a monoshock in the rear. The BMW F 900 R offers adjustment options for preload and rebound, while the Triumph Street Triple 765 RS offers additional adjustment options for compression.

BMW F 900 R 2020
The chassis of the BMW F 900 R is made of steel and has a twin-tube, load-bearing engine design. On the other hand, the Triumph Street Triple 765 RS has an aluminum frame with a twin-tube design.
When it comes to braking, both bikes have double disk brakes in the front with four pistons. The BMW F 900 R has a larger diameter of 320 mm compared to 310 mm for the Triumph Street Triple 765 RS. The BMW F 900 R also has radial technology for its front brakes, while the Triumph Street Triple 765 RS has radial, monoblock technology.
In terms of advanced rider assistance systems, both bikes have ABS. The BMW F 900 R also has anti-slipping control and riding modes, while the Triumph Street Triple 765 RS offers additional features such as riding modes, ride by wire, quickshifter, and traction control.
Moving on to dimensions and weights, both bikes have the same front and rear tire width and diameter. The BMW F 900 R has a longer wheelbase of 1518 mm compared to 1405 mm for the Triumph Street Triple 765 RS. The seat height of the BMW F 900 R is slightly lower at 815 mm compared to 825 mm for the Triumph Street Triple 765 RS. The BMW F 900 R is also slightly heavier with a kerb weight of 211 kg compared to 187 kg for the Triumph Street Triple 765 RS. However, the Triumph Street Triple 765 RS has a larger fuel tank capacity of 17.4 l compared to 13 l for the BMW F 900 R.

Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2020
Now, let's discuss the strengths and weaknesses of each bike. The BMW F 900 R has easy handling and high stability, thanks to its chassis with a fine response. The engine is well-behaved and the brakes perform without any issues. The seating position is active yet bearable, and there is an infinitely long list of accessories available for customization. However, the BMW F 900 R has a small fuel tank capacity of 13 liters, which may require more frequent refueling. Additionally, while the engine is good, it may not offer the same level of liveliness as the Triumph Street Triple 765 RS.
On the other hand, the Triumph Street Triple 765 RS has a fantastically lively engine and a high-quality standard. The quickshifter with blipper comes as standard, allowing for seamless gear shifts. The bike also produces a roaring sound, adding to the overall experience. The Brembo M50 brake system is excellent, providing strong and reliable stopping power. ABS and traction control are included as standard, enhancing safety. The sporty look of the bike is visually appealing, and it has a lower weight compared to the BMW F 900 R. However, some users have reported issues with the menu navigation and connectivity system, and the adjustment screws on the fork may be poorly accessible.
In conclusion, both the BMW F 900 R 2020 and the Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2020 have their own strengths and weaknesses. The BMW F 900 R offers easy handling, stability, and a well-behaved engine, while the Triumph Street Triple 765 RS provides a lively engine, high quality, and a sporty look. Ultimately, the choice between the two will depend on individual preferences and priorities.
Technical Specifications BMW F 900 R 2020 compared to Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2020
Pros and Cons in comparison
Pros and Cons in comparison
BMW F 900 R 2020

The BMW F 900 R offers easy-to-use cornering fun, enormously high stability, an active yet comfortable riding position and a smooth but also unemotional engine. Those who like it fast and twisty will be happy with it. The possibilities for configuration are almost endless but of course not free of charge.
Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2020

As before, the RS top model is indeed the most desirable of the Street Triples. In addition to the usual playful handling, the super-direct Brembo brakes and the lively character of the three-cylinder engine, there is now a more bulbous mid-range, upgraded electronics as well as a Brembo M50 brake and the once again sharpened appearance. Thanks to the very sporty Pirelli Supercorsa SP V3 tyres, trackdays are indeed a serious issue, and the now standard shift assistant with blipper function greatly increases the incentive to switch to the new model. A wonderful fun machine for both country road and track!
Price Comparison Avarage Market Price BMW F 900 R vs Triumph Street Triple 765 RS
There are a few key differences between a BMW F 900 R 2020 and a Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2020. In terms of price, the actual average price of a Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2020 is about 9% higher. Compared to Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2020 there are more BMW F 900 R 2020 bikes available on the 1000PS.de Marketplace, specifically 14 compared to 5. It takes less time to sell a BMW F 900 R with 82 days compared to 91 days for a Triumph Street Triple 765 RS. Since model year 2020 1000PS.de editors have written 24 reviews for the BMW F 900 R and 26 reviews for the Triumph Street Triple 765 RS since model year 2017. The first review for the BMW F 900 R was published on 11/5/2019 and now has more than 154,700 views. This compares to more than 58,400 views for the first review on Triumph Street Triple 765 RS published on 1/10/2017.