Honda CBF 600 S 2005 vs. Kawasaki ER-6f 2016

Honda CBF 600 S 2005

Honda CBF 600 S 2005

Kawasaki ER-6f 2016

Kawasaki ER-6f 2016

Loading...

Overview - Honda CBF 600 S 2005 vs Kawasaki ER-6f 2016

Honda CBF 600 S 2005

Honda CBF 600 S 2005

Kawasaki ER-6f 2016

Kawasaki ER-6f 2016

Technical Specifications Honda CBF 600 S 2005 compared to Kawasaki ER-6f 2016

Honda CBF 600 S 2005
Kawasaki ER-6f 2016

Engine and Drive Train

Engine powerEngine power78 HPEngine power72 HP
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
CylindersCylinders4Cylinders2
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
CoolingCoolingAirCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement599 ccmDisplacement649 ccm

Dimensions and Weights

WheelbaseWheelbase1,480 mmWheelbase1,410 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height880 mmSeat Height805 mm
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity19 lFuel Tank Capacity16 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Honda CBF 600 S 2005

Honda CBF 600 S 2005

The CBF has undergone a positive development in all respects, in both directions. Beginners, inexperienced riders or simply people who are learning and relearning to ride a motorbike will find it easy to settle in and acquire an increasingly confident ride with the new model.

Uncomplicated operation

easy handling

technical revisions

light weight

stiff

robust

comfort

hard sound

ABS.

No real changes to the optics went through.

Kawasaki ER-6f 2016

Kawasaki ER-6f 2016

Regardless of whether you take it on the dull way to work or on extended tours, the comfortable seating position, the quiet, low-vibration in-line two-cylinder and the agility in the angular movement bring riding pleasure in every situation.

Powerful sound

mobility

reasonable price

visually sophisticated

safe riding experience

(re-)beginner-friendly.

72 hp does not tear legs out

Price Comparison Average Market Price Honda CBF 600 S vs Kawasaki ER-6f

Price Honda CBF 600 S

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Kawasaki ER-6f

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons