Husqvarna WR 250 2012 vs. Honda CRF250M 2014

Technical Specifications Husqvarna WR 250 2012 compared to Honda CRF250M 2014

Husqvarna WR 250 2012

Honda CRF250M 2014

Show all

Same only

Differences

Husqvarna WR 250 2012

Honda CRF250M 2014

Engine and Drive Train

Bore	Bore	66 mm	Bore	76 mm
Stroke	Stroke	72 mm	Stroke	55 mm
Compression Ratio	Compression Ratio	8.4	Compression Ratio	10.7
Starter	Starter	Kick	Starter	Electric
Transmission	Transmission	Chain	Transmission	Chain
Cylinders	Cylinders	1	Cylinders	1
Strokes	Strokes	2-Stroke	Strokes	4-Stroke
Displacement	Displacement	249 ccm	Displacement	249 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspension	Front suspension	Upside-Down telescopic fork	Front suspension	Upside-Down telescopic fork
Brand	Brand	Kayaba	Brand	Showa

Suspension Rear

Brand	Brand	Kayaba	Brand	Showa

Brakes Rear

Type	Type	Disc	Type	Disc

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre width	Front tyre width	90 mm	Front tyre width	110 mm
Front tyre height	Front tyre height	90 %	Front tyre height	70 %
Front tyre diameter	Front tyre diameter	21 inch	Front tyre diameter	17 inch
Rear tyre width	Rear tyre width	140 mm	Rear tyre width	130 mm
Rear tyre height	Rear tyre height	80 %	Rear tyre height	70 %
Rear tyre diameter	Rear tyre diameter	18 inch	Rear tyre diameter	17 inch
Wheelbase	Wheelbase	1,465 mm	Wheelbase	1,446 mm
Seat Height	Seat Height	975 mm	Seat Height	855 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity	Fuel Tank Capacity	9.5 l	Fuel Tank Capacity	7.7 l