Husqvarna SMR 510 2006 vs. Husqvarna FE 501 2016

Husqvarna SMR 510 2006

Husqvarna SMR 510 2006

Husqvarna FE 501 2016

Husqvarna FE 501 2016

Loading...

Overview - Husqvarna SMR 510 2006 vs Husqvarna FE 501 2016

Husqvarna SMR 510 2006

Husqvarna SMR 510 2006

Husqvarna FE 501 2016

Husqvarna FE 501 2016

Technical Specifications Husqvarna SMR 510 2006 compared to Husqvarna FE 501 2016

Husqvarna SMR 510 2006
Husqvarna FE 501 2016

Engine and Drive Train

TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
CylindersCylinders1Cylinders1
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
DisplacementDisplacement501 ccmDisplacement510.4 ccm

Dimensions and Weights

WheelbaseWheelbase1,460 mmWheelbase1,482 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height975 mmSeat Height970 mm
Dry WeightDry Weight116 kgDry Weight113.5 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity9 lFuel Tank Capacity9 l

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Husqvarna SMR 510 2006

Husqvarna SMR 510 2006

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.

Husqvarna FE 501 2016

Husqvarna FE 501 2016

The touring tractor can now also count itself among the lightweights. Dry under 110 kg and well over 60 hp leave no room for excuses. It carries even the Wildecker Herzbuben (both of them) up every slope.

Total weight has become significantly lighter, strongest model, significantly better handling

most expensive model

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Husqvarna SMR 510 vs Husqvarna FE 501

Price Husqvarna SMR 510

Unfortunately, the data available to us is not sufficient to provide meaningful price information for this model.

Price Husqvarna FE 501

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH