KTM 790 Duke 2018 vs. Triumph Speed Triple R 2016

KTM 790 Duke 2018

KTM 790 Duke 2018

Triumph Speed Triple R 2016

Triumph Speed Triple R 2016

Loading...

Overview - KTM 790 Duke 2018 vs Triumph Speed Triple R 2016

In terms of engine power, the Triumph Speed Triple R 2016 takes the lead with 140 HP compared to the KTM 790 Duke 2018's 105 HP. The Speed Triple R also has an advantage in terms of engine displacement, with 1050ccm compared to the 799ccm of the Duke.

Both bikes feature an in-line engine type and liquid cooling system, ensuring optimal performance and temperature regulation. However, the Duke has a 2-cylinder engine while the Speed Triple R boasts a 3-cylinder engine, giving it a unique and powerful feel.

When it comes to suspension, both bikes have upside-down telescopic forks at the front and monoshock rear suspension. However, the Duke features WP suspension components, while the Speed Triple R is equipped with high-quality Öhlins suspension. The Speed Triple R also offers more adjustability options for the rear suspension, including compression, preload, and rebound adjustments.

KTM 790 Duke 2018

KTM 790 Duke 2018

In terms of chassis, the Duke has a chromium-molybdenum frame, while the Speed Triple R features an aluminum frame. The Duke's frame is tubular in design, while the Speed Triple R has a twin tube frame. Both frames are designed to provide optimal stability and handling.

When it comes to braking, both bikes feature double disk brakes at the front with four pistons. The Duke has a brake diameter of 300mm, while the Speed Triple R boasts a larger 320mm diameter. The Speed Triple R also features radial and monoblock technology, providing even more braking power and precision.

In terms of advanced rider assistance systems, both bikes offer ABS and traction control. The Duke goes a step further with additional riding modes, providing more customization options for different riding conditions.

In terms of dimensions and weights, the Duke has a slightly wider front tire at 120mm compared to the Speed Triple R's 120mm. The Speed Triple R, on the other hand, has a wider rear tire at 190mm compared to the Duke's 180mm. Both bikes have a 17-inch front and rear tire diameter. The Duke has a longer wheelbase at 1475mm compared to the Speed Triple R's 1435mm. Both bikes have the same seat height of 825mm. The Duke is lighter with a dry weight of 169kg compared to the Speed Triple R's 192kg. The Speed Triple R has a larger fuel tank capacity at 15.5 liters compared to the Duke's 14 liters.

Triumph Speed Triple R 2016

Triumph Speed Triple R 2016

In terms of strengths, the Duke is praised for its lively and high-revving engine, powerful acceleration, optimally tuned chassis for sporty riding, and comfortable seating position. It also offers many electronic gimmicks and functions, including an extremely precise quickshifter. The Speed Triple R is known for its powerful and unique three-cylinder engine, brute brakes, well-functioning electronic features, excellent Öhlins suspension components, and traditional look.

However, the Duke does have some weaknesses, including rough handling at low revs, being somewhat difficult to maneuver in city traffic, and some fiddly-looking switches on the handlebars. It is also reported to have oil leaks at the engine block on many 790 Dukes. The Speed Triple R's main weakness is its somewhat sluggish handling, and it also comes with a high surcharge for the R version.

In conclusion, both the KTM 790 Duke 2018 and the Triumph Speed Triple R 2016 have their strengths and weaknesses. The Duke offers a lively and sporty riding experience with advanced electronic features, while the Speed Triple R boasts a powerful engine and high-quality suspension components. Ultimately, the choice between the two will depend on the rider's preferences and priorities.

Technical Specifications KTM 790 Duke 2018 compared to Triumph Speed Triple R 2016

KTM 790 Duke 2018
Triumph Speed Triple R 2016

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeIn line
BoreBore88 mmBore79 mm
StrokeStroke65.7 mmStroke71.4 mm
Engine powerEngine power105 HPEngine power140 HP
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders2Cylinders3
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
Valves per cylinderValves per cylinder4Valves per cylinder4
ValvesValvesDOHCValvesDOHC
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement799 ccmDisplacement1,050 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork
BrandBrandWPBrandÖhlins
DiameterDiameter43 mmDiameter43 mm

Suspension Rear

SuspensionSuspensionSwing armSuspensionSingle swing arm
Shock absorberShock absorberMonoshockShock absorberMonoshock
BrandBrandWPBrandÖhlins
AdjustmentAdjustmentPreloadAdjustmentCompression, Preload, Rebound
MaterialMaterialAluminiumMaterialAluminium

Chassis

FrameFrameChromium-molybdenumFrameAluminium
Frame typeFrame typeTubularFrame typeTwin Tube

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeDouble disk
DiameterDiameter300 mmDiameter320 mm
PistonPistonFour pistonsPistonFour pistons
TechnologyTechnologyradialTechnologyradial, Monoblock

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
PistonPistonDouble pistonPistonDouble piston

Assistance Systems

Advanced Rider Assistance SystemsAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABS, Riding modes, Traction controlAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABS, Traction control

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width180 mmRear tyre width190 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height55 %Rear tyre height55 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
WheelbaseWheelbase1,475 mmWheelbase1,435 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height825 mmSeat Height825 mm
Dry Weight (with ABS)Dry Weight (with ABS)169 kgDry Weight (with ABS)192 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity14 lFuel Tank Capacity15.5 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

KTM 790 Duke 2018

KTM 790 Duke 2018

The KTM 790 Duke L is an absolutely sporty naked bike with a high fun factor. Whether a beginner rider can handle it depends very much on his or her personality and riding behaviour. There are certainly motorbikes better suited for learning, but sporty radius hunters will hardly be satisfied with anything else. The 790 Duke L is also rather unenthusiastic about everyday rides in the city. On the country road, however, it's a blast, even with only 48 hp. Simply a fun bike as it is written in the book.

Lively, high-revving engine with powerful acceleration

optimally tuned chassis for sporty riding

awesome sound even with series muffler

many electronic gimmicks and functions

extremely precise quickshifter that makes fast riding even easier

comfortable seating position

Rough handling at low revs

bitchy in city traffic

sometimes fiddly-looking switches on the handlebars

oil leak at the engine block on many 790 Dukes

Triumph Speed Triple R 2016

Triumph Speed Triple R 2016

Like its predecessor, the Speed Triple R delights with its high-quality, sensitively responding Öhlins suspension and its stunning looks. The design remains true to its line - which can only please the many fans. The engine's braking and responsiveness can hardly be complained about, but the lack of power on the competition and the somewhat sluggish handling can certainly be forgiven, after all, the Speed Triple is a classic with history and the design is legendary - which is much more important to true fans than the one or two extra horsepower.

Powerful and unique three-cylinder engine

brute brakes

well-functioning ewlectronic features

excellent Öhlins suspension components

traditional look.

somewhat sluggish handling

high surcharge for the R version

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price KTM 790 Duke vs Triumph Speed Triple R

There are a few key differences between a KTM 790 Duke 2018 and a Triumph Speed Triple R 2016. There are the same number of bikes of both models available on the 1000PS.de marketplace, specifically 24. It takes less time to sell a KTM 790 Duke with 58 days compared to 120 days for a Triumph Speed Triple R. Since model year 2018 1000PS.de editors have written 35 reviews for the KTM 790 Duke and 16 reviews for the Triumph Speed Triple R since model year 2012. The first review for the KTM 790 Duke was published on 11/9/2016 and now has more than 160,600 views. This compares to more than 11,100 views for the first review on Triumph Speed Triple R published on 10/24/2011.

Price KTM 790 Duke

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Triumph Speed Triple R

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH