KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2016 vs. KTM 690 Duke 2013

KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2016

KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2016

KTM 690 Duke 2013

KTM 690 Duke 2013

Loading...

Overview - KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2016 vs KTM 690 Duke 2013

The KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2016 and the KTM 690 Duke 2013 are both naked bikes from KTM, but they have significant differences in terms of power, performance, and features.

Starting with the engine and drive train, the KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2016 is equipped with a powerful 173 HP engine, while the KTM 690 Duke 2013 has a less powerful 68 HP engine. The Super Duke R also has a higher torque of 144 Nm compared to the 70 Nm of the 690 Duke. The Super Duke R has a larger displacement of 1301 ccm, while the 690 Duke has a smaller displacement of 690 ccm. The Super Duke R has two cylinders, whereas the 690 Duke has only one.

In terms of suspension, both bikes feature upside-down telescopic forks from WP. The chassis of both bikes is made of chromium-molybdenum and has a tubular frame design. The Super Duke R has a frame type of tubular, while the 690 Duke has a similar frame design.

KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2016

KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2016

When it comes to brakes, both bikes have four-piston front brakes with radial technology. The Super Duke R has monoblock brakes from Brembo, while the 690 Duke has Brembo brakes without the monoblock feature.

In terms of advanced rider assistance systems, the Super Duke R comes with ABS and traction control, providing added safety and control. The 690 Duke, on the other hand, features ride by wire technology.

In terms of dimensions and weights, both bikes have a front tire width of 120 mm and a front tire diameter of 17 inches. The Super Duke R has a wider rear tire width of 190 mm compared to the 160 mm of the 690 Duke. Both bikes have a rear tire diameter of 17 inches. The Super Duke R has a slightly longer wheelbase of 1482 mm compared to the 1466 mm of the 690 Duke. Both bikes have a seat height of 835 mm. The Super Duke R has a larger fuel tank capacity of 18 liters, while the 690 Duke has a smaller fuel tank capacity of 14 liters.

KTM 690 Duke 2013

KTM 690 Duke 2013

In terms of strengths, the Super Duke R stands out with its monstrous engine and torque, wide rev range, little vibration, strong brakes, extensive electronics, great extras, high-quality details, and unrivaled aggressive looks. On the other hand, the 690 Duke's strengths lie in its light weight, sufficient power, and low consumption.

As for weaknesses, the Super Duke R's only weakness is its automatic gearshift, which some riders may find a little too coarse. The 690 Duke, on the other hand, has no chassis adjustment possible and may lack in comfort compared to the Super Duke R.

In conclusion, the KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2016 is a high-performance naked bike with a powerful engine, advanced features, and aggressive looks. On the other hand, the KTM 690 Duke 2013 is a lighter and more fuel-efficient option with sufficient power. The choice between the two ultimately depends on the rider's preferences and intended use.

Technical Specifications KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2016 compared to KTM 690 Duke 2013

KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2016
KTM 690 Duke 2013

Engine and Drive Train

BoreBore108 mmBore102 mm
StrokeStroke71 mmStroke84.5 mm
Engine powerEngine power173 HPEngine power68 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power8,870 rpmRpm at Max. Power7,500 rpm
TorqueTorque144 NmTorque70 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque6,500 rpmRpm at Torque5,500 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio13.2 Compression Ratio12.6
StarterStarterElectricStarterElectric
Clutch TypeClutch TypeAntihoppingClutch TypeAntihopping
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
CylindersCylinders2Cylinders1
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
DisplacementDisplacement1,301 ccmDisplacement690 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork
BrandBrandWPBrandWP

Suspension Rear

BrandBrandWPBrandWP

Chassis

FrameFrameChromium-molybdenumFrameChromium-molybdenum
Frame typeFrame typeTubularFrame typeTubular

Brakes Front

PistonPistonFour pistonsPistonFour pistons
Shock mountShock mountFixed caliperShock mountFixed caliper
TechnologyTechnologyradial, MonoblockTechnologyradial
BrandBrandBremboBrandBrembo

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
PistonPistonDouble pistonPistonSingle piston
Shock mountShock mountFixed caliperShock mountFloating caliper
BrandBrandBremboBrandBrembo

Assistance Systems

Advanced Rider Assistance SystemsAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABS, Traction controlAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsRide by Wire

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width190 mmRear tyre width160 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height55 %Rear tyre height60 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
WheelbaseWheelbase1,482 mmWheelbase1,466 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height835 mmSeat Height835 mm
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity18 lFuel Tank Capacity14 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2016

KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2016

KTM knows no turning back and KTM knows no quarter. That's why the new 1290 Super Duke R is a little easier to handle than its predecessor, but also a little stronger and faster. Already at 2500 rpm, over 100 Nm are available, the maximum is 141, the top performance is stated at 177 hp. That may be too much, but it doesn't have to be. The electronics remain the lifeline in this category, where development continues to move forward strongly. KTM has started where it had difficulties and that was stability. Changes to the geometry and chassis have improved this significantly, making the ride on the beast not only faster, but also safer. The handling is no less radical for that, and the supermoto genes are more evident than on any other naked bike. There can only be one Super Duke.

Monstrous engine and torque

wide rev range

little vibration

strong brakes

extensive electronics

great extras

high-quality details

unrivalled aggressive looks.

Automatic gearshift a little too coarse

KTM 690 Duke 2013

KTM 690 Duke 2013

For pure fun, the 690 Duke without the R is already sufficient. The potent single-cylinder engine is almost identical, as is the weight and handling, and the appearance is too similar to be a real selling point for the 690 Duke R.

Light weight

sufficient power

low consumption

No chassis adjustment possible

low comfort

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price KTM 1290 Super Duke R vs KTM 690 Duke

There are a few key differences between a KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2016 and a KTM 690 Duke 2013. In terms of price, the actual average price of a KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2016 is about 117% higher. A KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2016 experiences a loss of 670 USD in one year and 1,840 USD in two years of ownership. This is offset by a loss of 200 USD and 610 USD for a KTM 690 Duke 2013. Compared to KTM 690 Duke 2013 there are more KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2016 bikes available on the 1000PS.de Marketplace, specifically 25 compared to 9. It takes less time to sell a KTM 690 Duke with 60 days compared to 81 days for the KTM 1290 Super Duke R. Since model year 2013 1000PS.de editors have written 65 reviews for the KTM 1290 Super Duke R and 29 reviews for the KTM 690 Duke since model year 2008. The first review for the KTM 1290 Super Duke R was published on 11/8/2012 and now has more than 4,900 views. This compares to more than 14,800 views for the first review on KTM 690 Duke published on 9/28/2007.

Price KTM 1290 Super Duke R

Model year
Current average market prices

Price KTM 690 Duke

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH