KTM 1190 RC8 R 2013 vs. BMW S 1000 R 2016

KTM 1190 RC8 R 2013

KTM 1190 RC8 R 2013

BMW S 1000 R 2016

BMW S 1000 R 2016

Loading...

Overview - KTM 1190 RC8 R 2013 vs BMW S 1000 R 2016

KTM 1190 RC8 R 2013

KTM 1190 RC8 R 2013

BMW S 1000 R 2016

BMW S 1000 R 2016

Technical Specifications KTM 1190 RC8 R 2013 compared to BMW S 1000 R 2016

KTM 1190 RC8 R 2013
BMW S 1000 R 2016

Engine and Drive Train

BoreBore105 mmBore80 mm
StrokeStroke69 mmStroke49.7 mm
Engine powerEngine power175 HPEngine power160 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power10,250 rpmRpm at Max. Power11,000 rpm
TorqueTorque127 NmTorque112 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque8,000 rpmRpm at Torque9,250 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio13.5 Compression Ratio12
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath, Antihopping
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
CylindersCylinders2Cylinders4
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
DisplacementDisplacement1,195 ccmDisplacement999 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork

Chassis

FrameFrameChromium-molybdenumFrameAluminium
Frame typeFrame typeTubularFrame typeTwin Tube

Brakes Front

PistonPistonFour pistonsPistonFour pistons
TechnologyTechnologyradial, MonoblockTechnologyradial

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
PistonPistonDouble pistonPistonSingle piston
Shock mountShock mountFixed caliperShock mountFloating caliper

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width190 mmRear tyre width190 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height55 %Rear tyre height55 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
WheelbaseWheelbase1,425 mmWheelbase1,439 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height805 mmSeat Height814 mm
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity16.5 lFuel Tank Capacity17.5 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

KTM 1190 RC8 R 2013

KTM 1190 RC8 R 2013

The RC8 from KTM has matured into a good motorbike. Unfortunately, the maturing process has taken a little too long. The engine characteristics are good, the chassis as well and the bike is great to ride both on the country road and on the race track.

Well-tuned suspension elements

fairly agile

acceptable brakes

positive cornering.

Performance could be higher

primarily designed for country roads.

BMW S 1000 R 2016

BMW S 1000 R 2016

With the BMW S 1000 R, you notice both the close relationship to the S 1000 RR superbike and the endeavour to equip the machine with a high degree of comfort for country roads and everyday use. Accordingly, the 1000cc four-cylinder power unit is brute and yet easily controllable, and the seating position is correspondingly sporty and comfortable. The fact that the S 1000 R is one of the most affordable power naked bikes is surprising and very pleasing, although one must not get hold of the list of optional extras - because thanks to the many irresistible features, it will certainly be more expensive.

Powerful and well controllable engine

powerful braking system

comfortable seating position

irresistible but expensive optional extras

hard chassis

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price KTM 1190 RC8 R vs BMW S 1000 R

Price KTM 1190 RC8 R

Model year
Current average market prices

Price BMW S 1000 R

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH